2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Test on Critical Thinking Level of Graduating Bachelor of Accounting Students: Malaysian Evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the levels of thinking Bloom's Taxonomy are categorized into two namely low-level thinking (remembering, understanding, and applying) and high-level thinking (analysing, evaluating, and creating) (Magas et al, 2017). Furthermore, critical thinking is included in the higher-order-thinking categories (Dwyer et al, 2014;Puteh & Hamid, 2014). So, critical thinking can be measured by analysing, evaluating, and creating (Dwyer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the levels of thinking Bloom's Taxonomy are categorized into two namely low-level thinking (remembering, understanding, and applying) and high-level thinking (analysing, evaluating, and creating) (Magas et al, 2017). Furthermore, critical thinking is included in the higher-order-thinking categories (Dwyer et al, 2014;Puteh & Hamid, 2014). So, critical thinking can be measured by analysing, evaluating, and creating (Dwyer et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Steps for Better Thinking model (Wolcott, 2011) was applied, both because it is theoretically grounded on such a developmental model and because it has also been previously applied in evaluating higher education students' critical thinking in several disciplines (e.g., Puteh & Hamid, 2014;Sungur, Tekkaya & Geban, 2006;Zygmont & Karen, 2006). Argumentative essay writing tasks were also applied, as well-developed argumentation can be seen to require similarly developed epistemic beliefs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are a few studies reporting that when students did not understand the grading process, they engaged in off-task behavior. However, this behavior was partially addressed with the use of rubrics (Piscitello, 2001;Toth, Suthers, & Lesgold, 2002). One possible explanation of this is that rubrics provide meaningful assignments and assessment to the students through transparency.…”
Section: How the Use Of Rubrics Can Enhance Students' Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%