2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A text processing pipeline to extract recommendations from radiology reports

Abstract: Communication of follow-up recommendations when abnormalities are identified on imaging studies is prone to error. The absence of an automated system to identify and track radiology recommendations is an important barrier to ensuring timely follow-up of patients especially with non-acute incidental findings on imaging examinations. In this paper, we present a text processing pipeline to automatically identify clinically important recommendation sentences in radiology reports. Our extraction pipeline is based o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They compared unigrams with and without their part-of-speech assignment and the report sections in which they appeared as features. With use of all features, the system had a sensitivity of 64.6% and an accuracy of 99.7% in 800 reports representing various imaging modalities at one medical center, and the system was only marginally better than use of unigrams alone (62.8% sensitivity, 99.7% accuracy) (24). Importantly, this work assessed how class prevalence in the machine learning training set affected performance.…”
Section: Recommendation Practices and Communication Of Critical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…They compared unigrams with and without their part-of-speech assignment and the report sections in which they appeared as features. With use of all features, the system had a sensitivity of 64.6% and an accuracy of 99.7% in 800 reports representing various imaging modalities at one medical center, and the system was only marginally better than use of unigrams alone (62.8% sensitivity, 99.7% accuracy) (24). Importantly, this work assessed how class prevalence in the machine learning training set affected performance.…”
Section: Recommendation Practices and Communication Of Critical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yetisgen-Yildiz et al (24) noted that miscommunication is the second most common cause of radiologist malpractice suits and developed a cascade of linguistic and machine learning methods to determine the likelihood that a sentence contained a recommendation. They compared unigrams with and without their part-of-speech assignment and the report sections in which they appeared as features.…”
Section: Recommendation Practices and Communication Of Critical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Natural language processing (NLP) techniques have been previously applied on radiology reports to classify and extract their information contents [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. For instance, the Lexicon Mediated Entropy Reduction (LEXIMER) system extracts and classifies phrases with important findings and recommendations from radiology reports through lexicon-based hierarchical decision trees [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%