“…Apart from evaluating to realize whether they accomplish the aim of conveying the knowledge (Najafi Sarem et al, 2013;Schmidt, et al, 2007), textbooks are evaluated so that the teachers would find out if they effectively suit their purposes while using the textbooks (Riazi & Mosalanejad, 2010;Kulm, et al, 1999). Other reasons include checking their appropriacy in a given context with wide and contextually relevant criteria to meet students' contextual needs and expectations (Farzaneh, Kohandani, & Nejadansari, 2014;Shah, Ahmed, & Mahmood, 2014), matching learners' needs to available solutions (Akbari & Pourabbas, 2015;Chowdhury, 2016;Grant, 1987;Tok, 2010), identifying textbooks' productivity and value as regards the aims, principles, or norms (Salehi, Khadivar, Babaee, & Singh, 2015), establishing discrimination between all offered textbooks on the market (Miekley, 2005;Sheldon, 1988), implementing new coursebooks and identifying minuses and pluses in certain textbooks being in use (Cunningsworth, 1995), and for conducting action research (Tomlinson, 1996). Furthermore, it is proposed that textbook evaluation leads to teachers' development and professional growth (Cunningsworth, 1995), as well as upsurge in students' attainment and success of educational programs (Genesee, 2001), and promoting the teachers' awareness to set requisites.…”