2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2003.11.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical and experimental study on the structure and dipole moment of phloroglucinol in ethanol

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The energy of the lowest energy conformer is 2.641/HF, 2.794/HF+, 3.921/DF, 4.127/DF+, 1.881/MP, and 1.140/MP+ lower for B‐ET6, where the first IHB forms on the same side as R′ and the OCH 3 methyl is oriented downward. In B‐ET2, the first IHB can only form with H17 and the OCH 3 methyl is perpendicular to the plane to minimize steric hindrances with both R and R′; like for phenol OH,19 perpendicularity of the OC bond of OCH 3 to the plane is energetically unfavorable. The energy difference between the lowest energy conformers of B‐P3‐ET2 and B‐P3‐ET6 increases to 6.292, likely because of two effects of the bulkier R′: greater steric hindrances with the OCH 3 methyl in B‐P3‐ET2 and greater energy of the first IHB in B‐P3‐ET6, where it forms on the same side as R′.…”
Section: Calculations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy of the lowest energy conformer is 2.641/HF, 2.794/HF+, 3.921/DF, 4.127/DF+, 1.881/MP, and 1.140/MP+ lower for B‐ET6, where the first IHB forms on the same side as R′ and the OCH 3 methyl is oriented downward. In B‐ET2, the first IHB can only form with H17 and the OCH 3 methyl is perpendicular to the plane to minimize steric hindrances with both R and R′; like for phenol OH,19 perpendicularity of the OC bond of OCH 3 to the plane is energetically unfavorable. The energy difference between the lowest energy conformers of B‐P3‐ET2 and B‐P3‐ET6 increases to 6.292, likely because of two effects of the bulkier R′: greater steric hindrances with the OCH 3 methyl in B‐P3‐ET2 and greater energy of the first IHB in B‐P3‐ET6, where it forms on the same side as R′.…”
Section: Calculations and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is showed by the absorbance of ethanol solvent is higher than the distilled water solvent because the hydroxyl group of ethanol can interact with the hydroquinone by the hydrogen bonding. The interaction between ethanol and hydroquinone formed the complex by the hydrogen bonding donor [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 5 (a) shows the signal slightly decreased with the longer coil. The longer coil will maximize the reaction between phloroglucinol and hydroquinone by the hydrogen bond from the hydroxyl group of phloroglucinol and hydroquinone [12]. When the mixed solution in coil 1 was reacted with the sodium hydroxide, the complex formation will not be maximum and decrease the signal.…”
Section: Optimization Of Mixing Coilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are dispersive in nature and, therefore, they can be taken into account only by computational These studies clearly highlighted features related to the acylphloroglucinol unit and, therefore, appearing in all ACPL molecules (besides specific features associated with functions that may be present in the R* or Rˆsubstituents). The general features comprise the dominant role of the intramolecular hydrogen bond (IHB) between the sp 2 O of the acyl group and a neighbouring phenol OH (termed 'first IHB') [5][6][7]10,11], and the nonnegligible influence of the orientation of the phenol OHs [6,7,12] and of the weaker C-H•••O IHBs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%