A theoretical framework for group psychotherapy

Further considerations on “a theoretical framework for group psychotherapy”: A summary and critique

“…Naar enumerates the following theoretical propositions, which borrow ",.. heavily from Rogers' the0ry ofpersonality and behavior" (Naar, 1975, p. 52):…”

“…This process, in turn, frees up energy previously used to maintain the defensive structure. (8) The result is the development of emotional integrity and energy in the dient for coping and self-actualizing behavior (Naar, 1975, pp. 52-53).…”

“…By and large one can conclude, both from the general nature of Dr. Naar's (1975) theoretieal statements and his admission that his framework was developed from his experience and for his and his elient's needs (p. 50), that the group population to whieh this model can be most readüy applied is one whose problems and motivations are more amenable to a less structured group atmosphere. This is not to say that more seriously disturbed clients will not respond to warmth, empathy, support and sensitive i~edback nr that Dr. Naar's therapeutic objectives of growth and selfrealization are not appropriate goals tbr distrubed clients.…”

“…It is unlikely, that outside of possessing terrain personal qualifications such as warmth, self-awareness and awareness of others, knowledge of emotional disturbance, and the ability to nurture these qualities in others (Naar, 1975), that there is a specific and prescribed role for the leadertherapist. Whether he is directive or non-directive, active or reflectivel "hefe and now" oriented or analytic should be a function of the dynamics of the particular group and the nature of the interventions the therapist/leader seeks to implement.…”