2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfa97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theoretical Investigation of the Magnetic-field-induced Transition in Fe X, of Importance for Measuring Magnetic Field Strengths in the Solar Corona

Abstract: The use of the magnetic-field-induced transition (MIT) in Fe X for the measurement of the magnetic field strength in the solar corona has been discussed and demonstrated in a number of recent studies. This diagnostic technique depends on, among other conditions, the accuracy of the atomic data for Fe X. In the present work, we carry out a large-scale calculation for the atomic properties needed for the determination of the MIT… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Judge et al (2016) and Landi et al (2020b) analyzed the astronomical observation of spectral line 1603 Å decaying from an upper level 3p 4 3d 2 G 7/2 to 4 D 5/2, 7/2 , and proposed ΔE of 3.6 ± 2.9 cm −1 and 2.29 ± 0.50 cm −1 , respectively. Recently, Li et al (2021) employed four calculation schemes and considered that the computation of ΔE exceeds the precision limits of current theoretical calculations, and therefore recommended the value of 2.29 ± 0.50 cm −1 . So there is at least a 20% uncertainty for the ΔE, and it is still important (though tough) work to measure the value of ΔE in the laboratory.…”
Section: Energy Separation δEmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Judge et al (2016) and Landi et al (2020b) analyzed the astronomical observation of spectral line 1603 Å decaying from an upper level 3p 4 3d 2 G 7/2 to 4 D 5/2, 7/2 , and proposed ΔE of 3.6 ± 2.9 cm −1 and 2.29 ± 0.50 cm −1 , respectively. Recently, Li et al (2021) employed four calculation schemes and considered that the computation of ΔE exceeds the precision limits of current theoretical calculations, and therefore recommended the value of 2.29 ± 0.50 cm −1 . So there is at least a 20% uncertainty for the ΔE, and it is still important (though tough) work to measure the value of ΔE in the laboratory.…”
Section: Energy Separation δEmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electron beam energy and current were set to 210 eV and 6.8 mA. uncertainty of A MIT was estimated to be 5% (Li et al 2021).…”
Section: Energy Separation δEmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To synthesize the coronal emissions, we followed Chen et al ( 2021) and calculated the contribution functions G(T, n e , B) of the Fe x 174, 175, 177, 184 and 257 Å lines as a function of electron temperature, density, and magnetic field strength (Li et al 2021).…”
Section: Models and Emission Line Synthesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used CHIANTI database (version 10.0; Dere et al 1997;Del Zanna et al 2021) to calculate the line emissivities. The original source for these data are Del Zanna et al (2012) for level energies and collision data, Wang et al (2020) for radiative transition data, and Li et al (2021) for A MIT values.…”
Section: Fe X Lines Used For Magnetic Field Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%