2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2017.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical model for the rotational stiffness of storage rack beam-to-upright connections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For component (10), a linear model is used to represent the brittle failure mode of the component. connections [8][9][10]. connections [8][9][10].…”
Section: Validation Of the Generalised Component Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For component (10), a linear model is used to represent the brittle failure mode of the component. connections [8][9][10]. connections [8][9][10].…”
Section: Validation Of the Generalised Component Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to predict the initial rotational stiffness of the beam-to-column connections used in cold-formed steel racks, Zhao et al [11] developed a corresponding mechanical model in 2017. The model was verified by experiments and the obtained results showed good agreement between the initial rotational stiffness given by the model and that recorded in the experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The behavior of the beam-to-column connections and the column bases has a major influence on the stability of rack structures [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Complex design details such as different mechanical devices used in beam-to-column connections (tabs and hooks without bolts and welds) do not allow the flexural behavior of the beam-to-column connections of steel storage racks to be easily predicted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also bring solutions to guarantee the optimum exploitation of resources, and foster more sustainable use of assets (Gerami et al 2008, Gholhaki et al 2008, Haddad 2008, Kheyroddin et al 2008, Sharbatdar et al 2008, Andalib et al 2018, Paknahad et al 2018, therefore, majority of studies have been conducted to determine the preference for familiarity or preference for novelty of structures (Ardalan et al 2009, Mohammadhassani et al 2013, 2014a, b, Mola-Abasi et al 2013, Eslami et al 2014, Toghroli et al 2014, Shahabi et al 2016, Toghroli et al 2018a. Accordingly, few studies are on the cold-form beamto-column connections (Mohammadhassani et al 2012, Sohel et al 2012, Talaiekhozani et al 2014, Zhao et al 2014, El Kadi and Kiymaz 2015, Shah et al 2015, Bao et al 2016, Shah et al 2016a, b, c, Bertocci et al 2017, El Kadi et al 2017 Corresponding author, Ph.D., E-mail: BuiTienDieu@gmail.com 2017a, Li et al 2017, Sarangapani and Ganguli 2017, Zhao et al 2017, Dai et al 2018, while few others are on the connections of C-Channel profile with bolted condition. The number of studies on cold-form profile for steel pallet racking connection with lugged ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%