2005
DOI: 10.2202/1949-6605.1541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theoretical Model to Explain the Overrepresentation of College Men among Campus Judicial Offenders: Implications for Campus Administrators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to recognize this gender difference and try to understand why men are more likely than women to commit gender prejudice. Harper et al (2005) proposed one model that presents a number of factors involved in the higher proportion of male offenders of student misconduct (including sexual harassment) on college campuses, but more research is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to recognize this gender difference and try to understand why men are more likely than women to commit gender prejudice. Harper et al (2005) proposed one model that presents a number of factors involved in the higher proportion of male offenders of student misconduct (including sexual harassment) on college campuses, but more research is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Men@USD Leadership Retreat was designed to address the fact that USD men are substantially underrepresented in cocurricular activities and overrepresented in the student conduct process. A group of faculty and administrators convened to reflect on this reality and quickly realized that USD students were experiencing what has been documented in the student development literature (Davis, ; Harper, Harris, & Mmeje, ). As we reflected on our experiences, we identified the need to create a heretofore nonexistent space for conversations about masculinity, a structure for participants to unpack the influences in their lives that work to narrow the range of acceptable ways of being in the world.…”
Section: Encouraging Reflection Through Leadership Retreatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite a history of privilege and success in higher education, troubling trends for student affairs and academic leaders have emerged with regard to college men (Kellom, 2004). College men are cited more often for nonacademic violations of campus judicial policies (Harper, Harris, & Mmeje, 2005), academic underachievement (Kellom, 2004;Sax, 2008), alcohol and substance abuse (Capraro, 2000;Courtenay, 1998), depression (Good & Mintz, 1990), and disengagement in campus programs and activities (Davis & Laker, 2004).…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than desiring sports, dangerous activities, or parties, men who study abroad prefer experience-seeking activities that challenge the mind and senses, such as study abroad (Schroth & McCormack, 2000). In terms of male gender socialization, traditional college males have higher alcohol use (Capraro, 2004) and are overrepresented as college judicial offenders (Harper, Harris, & Mmeje, 2005). As mentioned previously, men who study abroad desire more than parties and dangerous activities, which may provide evidence that men who study abroad do not subscribe to traditional notions of masculinity as much as male students who do not study abroad.…”
Section: Student Participation: Attitudes and Beliefsmentioning
confidence: 99%