A theoretical perspective of the cultural influences of individualism/collectivism, group membership, and performance variation on allocation behaviors of supervisors

Abstract

Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to strengthen the theoretical foundation of the distributive justice literature by isolating and exploring the major independent variables (individualism/ collectivism; subordinate group membership; and subordinate performance variations) identified from previous studies. Their individual and cumulative influence on supervisory allocation behaviour is the foundation of this paper. Design/methodology/approach -A conceptual exploration of past studies reveals the variables that impact the allocation choice of supervisors. Utilizing these factors, a theoretically based model that explores the direct and interactive influences of these independent variables on allocation behaviour, as well as the subsequent impact of the allocation behaviour on future supervisorssubordinate social exchanges are developed. Findings -A cogent, theoretical framework is delineated for a well-established research stream (distributive justice) that severely needs one. Propositions are also derived to direct future empirical inquiry. In sum, the allocation model succeeds in consolidating the plethora of fragmented studies that currently dot the distributive justice literary landscape. Practical implications -This paper synthesizes past allocation studies while developing a theoretically based model which illustrate the interaction of the major independent variables. Practically, it also shows that managers cannot ignore cultural factors when compensating employees. Originality/value -This paper provides a theoretical framework for past studies while laying the groundwork for future empirical inquiries on supervisory allocation choices.

Consumers’ switching motivations and intention in the case of bank mergers: a cross-cultural study

“…In the current study’s context, British customers tend to seek the advice of friends and family, although the ultimate decision is one that they make on their own. This is consistent with the fact that individualistic consumers tend to view themselves as detached, independent individuals willing to forgo the well-being of their social group to ensure their own individual advancement and needs (Fadil et al , 2009; Zhao and Chen, 2008):My partner would have an influence on it. Maybe my friends.…”

Integrating national culture measures in the context of business decision making

“…It is important to continue the development of measurements of culture. Cultures vary from each other, sub‐cultures exist within national culture and cultures change over time (Tung, 2008; Fadil et al , 2009; Inglehart and Baker, 2000). Therefore, robust measures of culture are needed.…”

“…This view has been challenged by a number of researchers due to the recognized diversity of some nations (Tung, 2008) and therefore the probable lack of similarity between a particular sample and the existing cultural measure results that exist from prior studies (secondary data). Cultural values cannot be assumed as there are many subgroups that exist within national borders and therefore by assigning secondary data results to a sample to represent their cultural values, you introduce error into the research (Tung, 2008; Fadil et al , 2009) and significantly reduce the predictive power of the CVDs (Taras et al , 2010). CVD values not only vary between sample groups (dependent on the membership of the sample) but vary for the same sample across time (Inglehart and Baker, 2000).…”