2006
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/18/8/001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study of ethylene, cyclopentene and 1-amino-3-cyclopentene adsorption on the silicon surface

Abstract: In this paper we report on a comparative ab initio study of the adsorption of ethylene, cyclopentene and 1-amino-3-cyclopentene on the silicon 100 surface. Accurate calculations of the reaction path have been carried out using a cluster model for the surface dimer (Si 9 H 12 ) and Gaussian-type basis functions. The dependence of the computed reaction path on the theoretical method is investigated; activation energies turn out to be quite independent of the method, and general trends can be found for the three … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with other calculations, 9,13,14,32 we find that for 0.5 ML coverage, the most stable adsorption configuration for C 2 H 4 is the on-top configuration, with the molecule lying on top of one out of two silicon dimers. For the 1 ML coverage ͑one C 2 H 4 molecule per silicon dimer͒ instead, the bridge configuration is the less energetic one ͑see Fig.…”
Section: A Ground State Geometrysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In agreement with other calculations, 9,13,14,32 we find that for 0.5 ML coverage, the most stable adsorption configuration for C 2 H 4 is the on-top configuration, with the molecule lying on top of one out of two silicon dimers. For the 1 ML coverage ͑one C 2 H 4 molecule per silicon dimer͒ instead, the bridge configuration is the less energetic one ͑see Fig.…”
Section: A Ground State Geometrysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For both ethylene and acetylene covered surfaces, we find [3] that at low coverage the binding energy of the on-top geometry is larger than that of the bridge, while the opposite happens at full coverages, in agreement with other calculations [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. The adsorption energies per adsorbed geometry are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Adsorption Geometriessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The reactivity in this system has also been investigated by using finite cluster approaches for the surface [7g,i,k–m] . However, most of these calculations yield a diradical mechanism with a transition‐state energy above the reference zero point.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%