Hydrocarbyl complexes,
(tBu3SiNH)3ZrR
(1-R), were prepared via metatheses of
(tBu3SiNH)3ZrCl
(1-Cl)
with RMgX or RLi (R = Me, Et, Cy, CH2Ph, allyl,
CHCH2, Ph, CH2
tBu, C⋮CPh,
C⋮CtBu), through addition of
isobutylene, H2CCCMe2, and acetylene to
1-H (R = iBu, dma, or
CHCH2), and by CH-bond activation; thermal
1,2-RH-elimination from 1-R produced putative
(tBu3SiNH)2ZrNSitBu3
(2), which was subsequently trapped by
R‘H. Thermolysis of 1-R (∼100 °C, R = Me or Cy)
in the presence of H2, c-C3H6, and
CH4 in cyclohexane or neat
C6H6, mesitylene, and toluene afforded
1-R (R = H, cPr, Me, Ph,
CH2-3,5-Me2C6H3) and a
mixture of 1-CH2Ph and
1-C6H4Me, respectively.
Exposure of 1-Cy to C2H4 or
C6H6 in cyclohexane provided
1-CHCH2 or 1-Ph,
respectively,
but further reaction produced
1
2-(trans-HCCH) and
1
2-(p-C6H4)
through double CH-bond activation. Thermolysis
of
(tBu3SiND)3ZrCH3
(1-(ND)3-CH3) in
C6H6 or C6D6 yielded
CH3D, and 1C6H5 or
1-(ND)3C6D5, through
reversible
benzene activation. Thermolysis of 1-Cy in neat
cyclohexane, and with C2H6 or CMe4
present, gave cyclometalation
product
(tBu3SiNH)2ZrNHSitBu2CMe2CH2
(3) and 1-NHSitBu3.
In THF, thermolysis of 1-CH3 afforded
(tBu3SiNH)2(THF)ZrNSitBu3 (2-THF);
at 25 °C, 1-H lost H2 in the presence of L (L
= THF, Et2O, NMe3, PMe3)
generating
2-L; 2-L (L = Et2O, py) was also
prepared via ligand exchange with 2-THF. Single crystal
X-ray diffraction studies
of 2-THF revealed a pseudotetrahedral core, with a long
ZrN bond distance (1.978(8) Å), normal Zr−N(H)
bond
lengths (2.028(8), 2.031(8) Å), similar amide
(154.7(5), 158.1(5)°) and imide (156.9(5)°) bond
angles, and little
O(pπ) → Zr(dπ) bonding. Crystal data: monoclinic,
P2
1
/n, a =
13.312(5) Å, b = 18.268(6) Å, c =
20.551(7) Å,
β = 92.30(3)°, Z = 4, T = 25 °C.
2-Et2O thermally eliminated
C2H4 to give 1-OEt through γ-CH
activation.
Kinetic isotope effects (KIE) on 1,2-RD-elimination from
1-(ND)3-R (96.7 °C, R = CH3,
z
Me = 6.3(1); CH2Ph,
z
Bz
= 7.1(6); Ph, z
Ph = 4.6(4))
and CD3H loss from 1-CD3
(k(CH3)/k(CD3) =
(z‘Me)3 = 1.32) revealed a
symmetric
H-transfer in a loose transition state. 1,2-RH-elimination rates
follow: (96.7 °C, k
R (×104
s-1) = 22.6(2), Ph;
15.5(2),
cPr; 13.2(4), CHCH2; 10.4(2), Cy;
3.21(6), Et; 3.2(1), iBu; 1.3(1), dma;
1.51(6), H; 1.42(4), CH2
tBu;
1.06(2), Me;
0.34(2),
CH2-3,5-Me2C6H3;
0.169(3), CH2Ph). Competition for
(tBu3SiNH)2ZrNSitBu3
(2) by RH/R‘H and equilibria
provided information about the stabilities of 1-R relative
to 1-cPr (R = cPr (0.0
kcal/mol) < Ph (0.3) < CH2Ph (0.7)
< Me (1.2) < CH2
tBu (≥7.6) < Et
(≥7.8) < Cy (≥10.9)). Transition state energies afforded
relative C−H bond
activation selectivities (ΔΔG
⧧ relative to
cPr-H): cPrH ≈ ArH (0.0 kcal/mol)
> MeH (3.4) > PhCH2H (4.0) >
cyclometalation (≥8.5) > EtH (≥8.9) >
tBuCH2H (≥9.3) > CyH (≥11.2). A
correlation of
ΔG
⧧(1,2-RH-elimination)
with D(R−H) indicated generally late transition states but
suggested an earlier composition for the alkyls, as
rationalized
through a Hammond analysis. Correlation of
ΔG
⧧(1,2-RH-elimination) with ...