2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2011.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theoretical study on the interaction of [Al(H2O)6]3+ and [Mg(H2O)6]2+ cations with fullerene (C60), coronene and benzene π-systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, topological analyses of the electron density and its Laplacian have been performed at bond critical points. Large ρ ( r ) values and ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) < 0 indicate polar and nonpolar covalent bonding interactions, whereas small ρ ( r ) values and ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) > 0 indicate closed-shell interactions [29]. Generally, ρ ( r ) is greater than 0.20 au for covalent bonding interactions and less than 0.10 au for closed-shell interactions [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, topological analyses of the electron density and its Laplacian have been performed at bond critical points. Large ρ ( r ) values and ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) < 0 indicate polar and nonpolar covalent bonding interactions, whereas small ρ ( r ) values and ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) > 0 indicate closed-shell interactions [29]. Generally, ρ ( r ) is greater than 0.20 au for covalent bonding interactions and less than 0.10 au for closed-shell interactions [29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large ρ ( r ) values and ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) < 0 indicate polar and nonpolar covalent bonding interactions, whereas small ρ ( r ) values and ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) > 0 indicate closed-shell interactions [29]. Generally, ρ ( r ) is greater than 0.20 au for covalent bonding interactions and less than 0.10 au for closed-shell interactions [29]. The values of ∇ 2 ρ ( r ) and – G ( r )/ V ( r ) were also used to characterize the bonding interactions in the complexes of EDA2BB investigated.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using AIM theory the ρ, HBCP, VBCP, GBCP, and ∇ 2 ρ(r), at the bond critical point of 8-HQ drug with B12N12 and Cu&B12N12, Ni&B12N12 nanocage complexes are calculated and outcomes are reported in Table 3. Based on the AIM theory, the strong covalent bond is indicated with ∇ 2 ρ(r) <0 and HBCP<0 values, the strong electrostatic bond is displayed with ∇ 2 ρ(r) >0 and HBCP>0 values, and partially covalent bond is determined with HBCP<0 and ∇ 2 ρ(r) >0 values [63][64][65]. The calculated results of Table 3 revealed that the values of ∇ 2 ρ(r) and HBCP for all adsorption models except the C-a model are positive and negative, respectively.…”
Section: Aim Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of ∇ 2 ρ(r) and −G(r)/V(r) were also used to characterize the bonding interactions in the compounds studied. Generally, G(r) is the kinetic Computational Chemistry energy density at the BCP (always positive) and V(r) is the potential energy density at the BCP (always negative) [43] When ∇ 2 ρ(r) > 0 and −G(r)/V(r) > 1, the interactions are noncovalent, whereas when ∇ 2 ρ(r) > 0 and 0.5 < −G(r)/V(r) < 1, the interactions are partially or partly covalent [44]. Based on the popular equation formulated by Espinosa [45] (E int = 0.5 V(r)), for estimating interatomic noncovalent bond interactions, selected bond interaction energies were calculated accordingly.…”
Section: Study Of One Of the Most Feasible Inhibitor-aluminium Interamentioning
confidence: 99%