2006
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/hhl030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Board Control and Size

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

40
531
2
6

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 960 publications
(579 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
40
531
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Inside directors, who are often executives of the firm, can facilitate effective decisionmaking because they are a valuable source of firm-specific information about constraints and opportunities (e.g., see Raheja, 2005;Harris and Raviv, 2008;and Adams, Hermalin, and Weisbach, 2009). As Jensen and Meckling (1990) discuss, the allocation of decision rights within an organization is a fundamental building block of organizational structure.…”
Section: The Role Of Information In Structuring Corporate Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inside directors, who are often executives of the firm, can facilitate effective decisionmaking because they are a valuable source of firm-specific information about constraints and opportunities (e.g., see Raheja, 2005;Harris and Raviv, 2008;and Adams, Hermalin, and Weisbach, 2009). As Jensen and Meckling (1990) discuss, the allocation of decision rights within an organization is a fundamental building block of organizational structure.…”
Section: The Role Of Information In Structuring Corporate Boardsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, previous literature (Klein 2002;Rosenstein & Wyatt 1997) argued that presence of Independent directors on board reduces the conflict of interest, increases the quality of monitoring and also improves the financial performance of the firm. On the other hand, several studies (Adams & Mehran 2005;Harris & Raviv 2008;Raheja 2005) believe that the effectiveness of supervision is not maintained by simply appointing more independent directors. The special nature of banks requires additional directors, particularly non-executives, should be endowed with the firm specific or specialized knowledge, abilities required monitoring, disciplining, and advising managers, thus enabling optimal decisions.…”
Section: Board Size and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the study also examines the causal effect of board structure on firm performance. Several studies attempt to explain the causal effect of board structure on firm performance (Adams & Ferreira 2007;Harris & Raviv 2008;Hermalin & Weisbach 1998;Raheja 2005). However majority of the studies exclude banks or financial firms from their studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yermack (1996) found an inverse relationship between board size and firm value. In contrast, Harris and Raviv's (2008) model of boards trades off additional monitoring services with free-riding predicting larger boards to provide optimal monitoring when managers' opportunities to consume private benefits are high. Hassan and Halbouni (2013) found that board size significantly influence the UAE accounting-based performance measure, while none of the governance variables significantly affect firms' market performance.…”
Section: Board Sizementioning
confidence: 99%