2006
DOI: 10.1037/0096-3445.135.4.513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A theory of dynamic occluded and illusory object perception.

Abstract: Humans see whole objects from input fragmented in space and time, yet spatiotemporal object perception is poorly understood. The authors propose the theory of spatiotemporal relatability (STR), which describes the visual information and processes that allow visible fragments revealed at different times and places, due to motion and occlusion, to be assembled into unitary perceived objects. They present a formalization of STR that specifies spatial and temporal relations for object formation. Predictions from t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
116
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
4
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such cues may signal to the visual system both when such extrapolation should occur (as the object starts gradually disappearing) and where the occluded object should reappear (at the far border of the occluder). Work in the contour interpolation literature supports the idea that powerful forms of extrapolation are possible for occluded objects, such that participants are sensitive to the alignment of visible edges with occluded (invisible) edges with surprising precision (Keane, Lu, & Kellman, 2007;Palmer, Kellman, & Shipley, 2006).…”
Section: The Present Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Such cues may signal to the visual system both when such extrapolation should occur (as the object starts gradually disappearing) and where the occluded object should reappear (at the far border of the occluder). Work in the contour interpolation literature supports the idea that powerful forms of extrapolation are possible for occluded objects, such that participants are sensitive to the alignment of visible edges with occluded (invisible) edges with surprising precision (Keane, Lu, & Kellman, 2007;Palmer, Kellman, & Shipley, 2006).…”
Section: The Present Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Previous work on amodal completion (e.g., Palmer et al, 2006) has emphasized that people fill in information behind the occluder. Given that amodal completion can occur during online object processing, why do we find that completion sometimes appears to be present and sometimes absent?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers who have explored the impact of occlusion on object perception have primarily focused on the ability of observers to perceive complete objects behind an occluding element (amodal completion; e.g., Kellman & Shipley, 1992;Murray, Sekuler, & Bennett, 2001;Palmer, Kellman, & Shipley, 2006;Rensink & Enns, 1998;Sekuler & Palmer, 1992).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that a dynamic update would advance the representation in the direction of rotation. Experiments on spatiotemporal relatability show that the representation of a partially occluded object is dynamically updated through time (Palmer, Kellman, & Shipley, 2006). In the tunnel effect, a representation of an object is maintained and dynamically updated while it moves behind an occluder (Flombaum & Scholl, 2006;Kawachi & Gyoba, 2006).…”
Section: ) Nonmotion Dot Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%