2001
DOI: 10.1006/inco.2000.3024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Observables for Logic Programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variable-free logic programs and SLD derivations over such programs bear a strong resemblance to finitely branching transition systems (see also [5,7]): atoms play the role of states, and the implication arrow ← used to define clauses plays the role of the transition relation. The main difference between logic programs and transition systems is that each atom is sent to the subset of subsets of atoms appearing in the program, and thus the finite powerset functor P f is iterated twice.…”
Section: Coalgebraic Semantics For Ground Logic Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Variable-free logic programs and SLD derivations over such programs bear a strong resemblance to finitely branching transition systems (see also [5,7]): atoms play the role of states, and the implication arrow ← used to define clauses plays the role of the transition relation. The main difference between logic programs and transition systems is that each atom is sent to the subset of subsets of atoms appearing in the program, and thus the finite powerset functor P f is iterated twice.…”
Section: Coalgebraic Semantics For Ground Logic Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the result above relates to the Theory of Observables for logic programming developed in [7]. According to this theory, traditional characterisation of logic programs in terms of input/output behaviour is not sufficient for the purposes of program analysis and optimisation.…”
Section: Coalgebraic Semantics and Parallel Execution Of Logic Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations