2006
DOI: 10.1257/000282806779468571
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Participation in Elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
229
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(239 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
229
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the ethical voting literature (Harsanyi 1980, Coate and Conlin 2004, Feddersen and Sandroni 2006 voters decide on the ground of moral principles and they derive utility from adhering to them. The leader-follower theories (Uhlaner 1989, Morton 1991, Shachar and Nalebuff 1999, Herrera and Martinelli 2006 emphasize the role of leaders and their ability to impose sanctions or to provide rewards in motivating social groups to participate in elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the ethical voting literature (Harsanyi 1980, Coate and Conlin 2004, Feddersen and Sandroni 2006 voters decide on the ground of moral principles and they derive utility from adhering to them. The leader-follower theories (Uhlaner 1989, Morton 1991, Shachar and Nalebuff 1999, Herrera and Martinelli 2006 emphasize the role of leaders and their ability to impose sanctions or to provide rewards in motivating social groups to participate in elections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows to consider a game between two players, the minority and the majority. 4 A similar degree of coordination is assumed in ethical voters models (Coate and Conlin 2004;Feddersen and Sandroni 2006). Groups preferences are defined on the minority/majority dimension: each group aims at maximizing the number of elected candidates representing its interests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rule or group utilitarian models of turnout (see, e.g., Harsanyi [16], Feddersen and Sandroni [11,12], Coate and Conlin [6]) assume that individuals are ethical in the sense that they follow the rule that if followed by everybody else in the population (or their group) maximizes the welfare of the population (or the group to which they belong). Expressive voting models (see, e.g., Fiorina [14]; Aldrich [2]; Schuessler [30]; Hillman [17,18]; Degan [8]; Ortoleva and Snowberg [25]) assume that individuals bene…t from voting due to the utility they derive from self-expression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%