1998
DOI: 10.2307/249668
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness

Abstract: A Theory of Task/Technology Fit and Group Support Systems Effectiveness^o f task complexity and their relationship to relevant dimensions of GSS technology. Propositions to guide further research are developed from the theory. AbstractThe characteristics of a group's task have been shown to account for more than half the variation in group interaction. In the context of group support systems (GSS), the importance of task has been underscored by the recommendation that achieving a fit between task and technolog… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
545
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 703 publications
(555 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
6
545
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The task for all teams was to design a system; it was intended to be fuzzy [2], complex and require extensive discussion and negotiation among team members, having multiple possible outcomes and no single correct answer [33]. Team members were asked to develop a high-level design of a support system for the Olympic Games.…”
Section: Task Deliverablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task for all teams was to design a system; it was intended to be fuzzy [2], complex and require extensive discussion and negotiation among team members, having multiple possible outcomes and no single correct answer [33]. Team members were asked to develop a high-level design of a support system for the Olympic Games.…”
Section: Task Deliverablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a heuristic perspective, it is helpful to come to some kind of categorisation based on this function or purpose. For that, we focused on literature from three different debates about support technology: GSS (Dennis et al 2002;Zigurs andBuckland 1998), geocollaboration (MacEachren andBrewer 2004) and PSS (Geertman and Stillwell 2009). We hereby aim to develop a synthesis of a set of more or less generic planning tasks, not to develop an extensive or very detailed description of planning tasks.…”
Section: Conceptual Framework: Task-technology Fitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contingent models have, for example, been applied in vague and ambiguous situations, where the information available could be interpreted in many ways depending on perspective (Galegher & Kraut, 1994). Contingency factors have included leadership style (Hersey & Blanchard, 1969, 1981, communication support, process structuring and information processing (Zigurs & Buckland, 1998;Zigurs, Buckland, Connolly, & Wilson, 1999), as well as task complexity and whether the technology is appropriate for the task ( Van de Ven & Drazin, 1985).…”
Section: Creativity and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%