2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.02.078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thermal management device for a lower-limb prosthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A compact fan then moved the heat flux from the heat sink to the surrounding environment (Fig. 14c) [123]. The preliminary prototype showed a cooling capability ranging from 2.1 W to 7.0 W and it was able to maintain a constant temperature.…”
Section: B Existing Solutions To Avoid Stump Overheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A compact fan then moved the heat flux from the heat sink to the surrounding environment (Fig. 14c) [123]. The preliminary prototype showed a cooling capability ranging from 2.1 W to 7.0 W and it was able to maintain a constant temperature.…”
Section: B Existing Solutions To Avoid Stump Overheatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have employed thermocouples, thermography and hygrometer devices to monitor the microclimate at a loaded skin interface [ 47 ]. They have revealed elevated temperature and humidity values in the plantar aspects of the foot [ 48 ], the residual amputee stump-socket interface of amputees [ 49 ] or at tissues where high forces are transmitted through foot orthoses [ 50 ]. These changes will inevitably reduce the skin tolerance to mechanical-induced damage [ 51 53 ].…”
Section: A Bioengineering Approach Measurement and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude, this note suggests that in scaled-down liner scenarios, passive heat transport solutions are unlikely to improve heat decay at a simulated prosthesis interface. Unless the thermal conductivity of elastomers can be increased beyond the elastomers used here, or suspension liners are radically rethought, active solutions used in the study of Han et al 22 and Ghoseiri et al 23 may be a more promising avenue to mitigate and prevent thermal discomfort for prosthesis wearers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%