1996
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1996.0366
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Thermodynamic Model for Micellar Growth on the Basis of Light Scattering Intensities from Extremely Dilute Solutions of Nonionic Surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although several thermodynamic studies of the second cmc have been reported during the past decades, from either a phenomenological [1,4,12,[14][15][16] or a molecular thermodynamical [17,18] point of view, several aspects of the aggregation process in the sphere to rod transition remain to be clarified. This is the case for the dependence of the second cmc on the monomer chain length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although several thermodynamic studies of the second cmc have been reported during the past decades, from either a phenomenological [1,4,12,[14][15][16] or a molecular thermodynamical [17,18] point of view, several aspects of the aggregation process in the sphere to rod transition remain to be clarified. This is the case for the dependence of the second cmc on the monomer chain length.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] and references therein). Amphiphilic molecules are formed by a hydrophilic polar head and a hydrophobic tail, consequently showing a striking tendency to minimize their free energies in solution by cooperative [9][10][11] self-assembly either at interfaces or by forming large micellar aggregates in the bulk at concentrations above a well-defined concentration called the critical micelle concentration (cmc) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In concentrated solutions, since the adsorption on the wall of the container could be neglected compared to the bulk solution, it has little effects on the viscosity 16. However, in extremely dilute solutions ( C < 10 −2 g/cm 3 ),17 the actual concentration of solution is inevitably lessened due to the adsorption of solute onto the inner wall of the container, and then the inner radius of viscometer capillary reduces for the same reason, therefore the measured viscosity appears deviation. For instance, a graph of reduced viscosity plotted against concentration shows an upward curve as the concentration dips below a certain level 18, 19.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where DM is the diffusion coefficient of the center of mass of worm-like micelles, (d) is the mean distance between the centers of mass of adjacent micelles, and q=~g is the time In dilute solutions, N is proportional to c ~12 after a threshold concentration [18,19]. If this relation holds up to semidilute region, we have <d) < c-1i6.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%