1998
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6454(98)00155-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thermodynamic model for the stacking-fault energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the Burgers vector of a perfect dislocation, b 0 ϭ a/2 Ͻ110Ͼ ϭ 2.53 ϫ 10 Ϫ10 m, [13] where a is the lattice parameter of the austenite phase, the Burgers vector of a partial dislocation is b P ϭ a/6 Ͻ112Ͼ ϭ 1.46 ϫ 10 Ϫ10 m, [13] and the SFE is ␥ ϭ 0.020 J/m 2 , [14] we can plot the activation energy of nucleation (⌬G) for a perfect and for a partial dislocation loop, as a function of the loop radius. For the calculations, we will use a range of shear stresses from ϭ 1 GPa to ϭ 160 MPa.…”
Section: A Nucleation Of Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the Burgers vector of a perfect dislocation, b 0 ϭ a/2 Ͻ110Ͼ ϭ 2.53 ϫ 10 Ϫ10 m, [13] where a is the lattice parameter of the austenite phase, the Burgers vector of a partial dislocation is b P ϭ a/6 Ͻ112Ͼ ϭ 1.46 ϫ 10 Ϫ10 m, [13] and the SFE is ␥ ϭ 0.020 J/m 2 , [14] we can plot the activation energy of nucleation (⌬G) for a perfect and for a partial dislocation loop, as a function of the loop radius. For the calculations, we will use a range of shear stresses from ϭ 1 GPa to ϭ 160 MPa.…”
Section: A Nucleation Of Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SFE dependence on Cr and Ni is well documented in the literature, and the experimental measurements are in good agreement with the thermodynamic models. [20,21] For the conventional 304 and 316 austenitic stainless steels, the SFE ranges from 9 to 30 mJ/m 2 and from 34 to 80 mJ/m 2 , respectively. [20] However, no experimental data on the SFE of the investigated steel are available in the literature.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the dependence of APB energy has a quadratic dependence on composition as used previously by Vamsi et al [23]. Such a quadratic dependence of fault energy on composition has been also been used for modeling intrinsic stacking fault energy in a Fe-Cr-Ni solid solution [34]. The strength of the present model lies in the fact that it would potentially allow the determination of APB energy for any arbitrary composition of X, in Ni 3 Al (1−x) X x with the knowledge of only three terms, i.e., the APB energy for the terminal Ni 3 Al and Ni 3 X compounds and for one configuration of Ni 3 Al 0.5 X 0.5 .…”
Section: Nearest Neighbour Bond Modelmentioning
confidence: 90%