A thermodynamic study of sodium-intercalated TaS2 and TiS2

Nagelberg, A. S.; Worrell, W. L.

doi:10.1016/0022-4596(79)90191-9

Cited by 143 publications

(72 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…As a matter of fact, SIBs were originally researched in tandem with Li batteries in the late 1970's and early 1980's [12][13][14][15]. The successful application of LIBs diverted the attention and focus of scientist from SIBs [16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

A review of carbon materials and their composites with alloy metals for sodium ion battery anodes

Balogun

Luo

Qiu

et al. 2016

Carbon

582

314

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 97%

A review of carbon materials and their composites with alloy metals for sodium ion battery anodes

Balogun

Luo

Qiu

et al. 2016

Carbon

582

314

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] Since then, however, research into sodium-ion (Na-ion) batteries have been sporadic, [13][14][15] due in no small part to the successes of Li-ion battery chemistry. Nevertheless, there has been a resurgence of research interest in Na-ion battery chemistries in recent years [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] because of its potential cost advantages.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials

Ong

Chevrier

Hautier

et al. 2011

Energy Environ. Sci.

1,309

1,046

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To evaluate the potential of Na-ion batteries, we contrast in this work the difference between Na-ion and Li-ion based intercalation chemistries in terms of three key battery properties -voltage, phase stability and diffusion barriers. The compounds investigated comprise the layered AMO 2 and AMS 2 structures, the olivine and maricite AMPO 4 structures, and the NA-SICON A 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 structures. The calculated Na voltages for the compounds investigated are 0.18-0.57 V lower than that of the corresponding Li voltages, in agreement with previous experimental data. We believe the observed lower voltages for Na compounds are predominantly a cathodic effect related to the much smaller energy gain from inserting Na into the host structure compared to inserting Li. We also found a relatively strong dependence of battery properties with structural features. In general, the difference between the Na and Li voltage of the same compound, ∆V Na-Li , is less negative for the maricite structures preferred by Na, and * To whom correspondence should be addressed 1 more negative for the olivine structures preferred by Li. The layered compounds have the most negative ∆V Na-Li . In terms of phase stability, we found that open structures, such as the layered and NASICON structures that are better able to accommodate the larger Na + ion generally have both Na and Li versions of the same compound. For the close-packed AMPO 4 structures, our results show that Na generally prefers the maricite structure, while Li prefers the olivine structure, in agreement with previous experimental work. We also found surprising evidence that the barriers for Na + migration can potentially be lower than that for Li + migration in the layered structures. Overall, our findings indicate that Na-ion systems can be competitive with Li-ion systems.

show abstract

“…As an alternative, Na-ion batteries (NIBs) have recently drawn significant attention because, unlike Li, Na is a ubiquitous and earth-abundant element. NIBs were originally developed in the late 1980s, in approximately the same time period as LIBs [1][2][3] , and the demand for large-scale energy storage for grid applications has recently revived the interest. Most of the recent research on NIB electrode materials has focused mainly on cathodes, but here we concentrate instead on a possible new anode material.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Expanded graphite as superior anode for sodium-ion batteries

et al. 2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Graphite, as the most common anode for commercial Li-ion batteries, has been reported to have a very low capacity when used as a Na-ion battery anode. It is well known that electrochemical insertion of Na þ into graphite is significantly hindered by the insufficient interlayer spacing. Here we report expanded graphite as a Na-ion battery anode. Prepared through a process of oxidation and partial reduction on graphite, expanded graphite has an enlarged interlayer lattice distance of 4.3 Å yet retains an analogous long-range-ordered layered structure to graphite. In situ transmission electron microscopy has demonstrated that the Na-ion can be reversibly inserted into and extracted from expanded graphite. Galvanostatic studies show that expanded graphite can deliver a high reversible capacity of 284 mAh g À 1 at a current density of 20 mA g À 1 , maintain a capacity of 184 mAh g À 1 at 100 mA g À 1 , and retain 73.92% of its capacity after 2,000 cycles.

show abstract

A thermodynamic study of sodium-intercalated TaS2 and TiS2

Cited by 143 publications

References 22 publications

A review of carbon materials and their composites with alloy metals for sodium ion battery anodes

A review of carbon materials and their composites with alloy metals for sodium ion battery anodes

Voltage, stability and diffusion barrier differences between sodium-ion and lithium-ion intercalation materials

Expanded graphite as superior anode for sodium-ion batteries

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About