2012
DOI: 10.1080/08927022.2011.613383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thermodynamic study of the mid-density scheme to determine the equilibrium phase transition in cylindrical pores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of points, which may not have been widely recognized, are listed below: There is hysteresis in both open- and closed-end pores, but the loop for the open-end pore is significantly larger. The change in density on adsorption is vertical in the open-end pore, but, although sharp, it is not vertical in the closed-end pore. The onset of condensation for the open-end pore (point C) occurs at a higher pressure than the for corresponding closed-end pore, and the pore density just before the jump is also higher. The adsorbed density just before condensation is always higher than that just after evaporation for both open-end and closed-end pores. This is referred to as delayed condensation in the literature because the condensation occurs at a pressure higher than the equilibrium pressure. Both desorption boundaries for the open-end and closed-end pores have a knee (from F to G) just before evaporation. The equilibrium transitions (dashed line) are second order for both open- and closed-end pores, in contrast to the first-order transitions in pores of infinite length. ,, The equilibrium branch is closer to the desorption branch for the open-end pore but to the adsorption branch for the closed-end pore. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A number of points, which may not have been widely recognized, are listed below: There is hysteresis in both open- and closed-end pores, but the loop for the open-end pore is significantly larger. The change in density on adsorption is vertical in the open-end pore, but, although sharp, it is not vertical in the closed-end pore. The onset of condensation for the open-end pore (point C) occurs at a higher pressure than the for corresponding closed-end pore, and the pore density just before the jump is also higher. The adsorbed density just before condensation is always higher than that just after evaporation for both open-end and closed-end pores. This is referred to as delayed condensation in the literature because the condensation occurs at a pressure higher than the equilibrium pressure. Both desorption boundaries for the open-end and closed-end pores have a knee (from F to G) just before evaporation. The equilibrium transitions (dashed line) are second order for both open- and closed-end pores, in contrast to the first-order transitions in pores of infinite length. ,, The equilibrium branch is closer to the desorption branch for the open-end pore but to the adsorption branch for the closed-end pore. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…On a rectangular surface, two phases coexist in strip form and there is a vertical segment in the middle of the unstable branches of the loop. The equilibrium phase transition determined by the MDS [32,33] was found to coincide with the vertical segment of the vdW-like loops in the meso-canonical isotherms, adding further support to the validity of the MDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The mid-density scheme (MDS) developed by Liu et al [32,33] to determine the equilibrium transition in the hysteresis loop of capillary condensation in mesoporous solids was applied to locate the 2D-transition of the adsorbed argon at temperatures less than the 2D-critical temperature. At a given chemical potential m* in the hysteresis loop, the two states on the hysteresis boundary are N A and N B .…”
Section: Mid-density Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with conventional but computationally expensive methods, the middensity scheme is a simplified but useful approach to identify the equilibrium phase transition in a hysteresis loop [33]. It has been successfully applied to study argon adsorption in graphite slit pores and in silica cylindrical pores [33,44]. The researchers who proposed this method also demonstrated [45] that its validity for the determination of the equilibrium state is supported by the commonly used canonical ensemble kinetic Monte Carlo (CE-kMC) [46,47] and gauge cell methods [36,37,48].…”
Section: Simulation Models and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%