Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
A broad view of polymer viscoelasticity is presented. The article first discusses the basic definitions of stress and strain and the material modulus and compliance properties that relate the two in linear elasticity theory. The time‐dependent analogues in viscoelasticity are presented. The beginnings of polymer viscoelasticity concepts are then presented by building mechanical analogues of springs (elastic) and dashpots (viscous) elements that can capture the general features of polymeric behavior. A brief discussion of the elastic–viscoelastic correspondence principle is also provided. The general viscoelastic response of polymeric materials is presented by emphasizing the amorphous state and how the isochronal modulus changes with temperature. This is analyzed within the context of time–temperature superposition ideas and the Williams, Landel, and Ferry equation. In particular, it is interesting to divide the behavior into that below and far above the glass‐transition temperature. In the former case the local segmental motions of the polymer dominate behavior, while in the latter the long‐chain nature of the polymer dominates behavior. Molecular rheology ideas are briefly presented where the idea of the chain length or molecular weight dependence of the viscosity is introduced. This is extended by considering the scaling of viscosity and plateau modulus due to concentration as well as the introduction of time–concentration superposition principles similar to time–temperature principles. The nonlinear rheological response of polymers far above the glass‐transition temperature is handled within a combined framework of the phenomenological K‐BKZ model and the Doi–Edwards (DE) tube model, which is based on the reptation ideas of de Gennes. The K‐BKZ framework is particularly useful because it looks much like time‐dependent finite elasticity theory that has been widely and successfully applied to rubber network polymers. Extensive discussion is presented of the comparison between theory and experiment of both K‐BKZ and DE models for polymer nonlinear viscoelastic behavior in the melt and solution states. Below the glass‐transition temperature, measurements of the nonlinear viscoelastic response are examined within the framework of the BKZ model, but also considering compressibility. Emphasis is given to torsional experiments in which both the torque and the normal force are measured. This exposition is followed by a description of several other nonlinear viscoelastic models that have been used for describing solid polymers. This article ends with a brief mention of plasticity models for the behavior of polymeric solids.
A broad view of polymer viscoelasticity is presented. The article first discusses the basic definitions of stress and strain and the material modulus and compliance properties that relate the two in linear elasticity theory. The time‐dependent analogues in viscoelasticity are presented. The beginnings of polymer viscoelasticity concepts are then presented by building mechanical analogues of springs (elastic) and dashpots (viscous) elements that can capture the general features of polymeric behavior. A brief discussion of the elastic–viscoelastic correspondence principle is also provided. The general viscoelastic response of polymeric materials is presented by emphasizing the amorphous state and how the isochronal modulus changes with temperature. This is analyzed within the context of time–temperature superposition ideas and the Williams, Landel, and Ferry equation. In particular, it is interesting to divide the behavior into that below and far above the glass‐transition temperature. In the former case the local segmental motions of the polymer dominate behavior, while in the latter the long‐chain nature of the polymer dominates behavior. Molecular rheology ideas are briefly presented where the idea of the chain length or molecular weight dependence of the viscosity is introduced. This is extended by considering the scaling of viscosity and plateau modulus due to concentration as well as the introduction of time–concentration superposition principles similar to time–temperature principles. The nonlinear rheological response of polymers far above the glass‐transition temperature is handled within a combined framework of the phenomenological K‐BKZ model and the Doi–Edwards (DE) tube model, which is based on the reptation ideas of de Gennes. The K‐BKZ framework is particularly useful because it looks much like time‐dependent finite elasticity theory that has been widely and successfully applied to rubber network polymers. Extensive discussion is presented of the comparison between theory and experiment of both K‐BKZ and DE models for polymer nonlinear viscoelastic behavior in the melt and solution states. Below the glass‐transition temperature, measurements of the nonlinear viscoelastic response are examined within the framework of the BKZ model, but also considering compressibility. Emphasis is given to torsional experiments in which both the torque and the normal force are measured. This exposition is followed by a description of several other nonlinear viscoelastic models that have been used for describing solid polymers. This article ends with a brief mention of plasticity models for the behavior of polymeric solids.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.