2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thermodynamically motivated implicit gradient damage framework and its application to brick masonry cracking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
65
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
65
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was noted in [21] that the regularized hardening law (2.24) differs from the function R(χ ) which is obtained by substituting the variable p by the micromorphic/regularized variable χ in the hardening function, as initially proposed in [59]. This inconsistency leads to difficulties in combining hardening and softening material behaviour, as recognized in [20,60,61], difficulties that are settled by adopting the previous thermodynamic framework.…”
Section: (B) Scalar Microstrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It was noted in [21] that the regularized hardening law (2.24) differs from the function R(χ ) which is obtained by substituting the variable p by the micromorphic/regularized variable χ in the hardening function, as initially proposed in [59]. This inconsistency leads to difficulties in combining hardening and softening material behaviour, as recognized in [20,60,61], difficulties that are settled by adopting the previous thermodynamic framework.…”
Section: (B) Scalar Microstrainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…= {u, χ ∼ }. The theory is presented here in the case of a symmetric microstrain tensor χ ∼ following [20,41,53] which is less general than Eringen's original nonsymmetric microdeformation. The microstrain components χ ij are generally distinct from those of the classical small strain tensor ε ij = (u i,j + u j,i )/2.…”
Section: (A) Microstrain Tensor Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This equation expresses "that no direct energy exchange can exist with the surroundings of the body and ensures that the net dissipation in the body vanishes for constant damage" [55] However, as it will be shown in the next section, this boundary condition will be accounted for when establishing the finite-element formulation, and will not have to be enforced explicitly during the computation.…”
Section: Governing Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%