2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.04.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A thick-interface model for diffusive and massive phase transformation in substitutional alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However the formula for calculating the solute drag for a migrating phase boundary into a multi-component system in steady-state conditions has been a subject of debates over the years and it was only recently that a valid expression has been found with a remarkable amount of empirical insight [11]. The general expression has also been derived in a deductive and completely independent way by applying the principle of maximum dissipation in [12].Even if in the recent years more complex situations than the one treated in the initial works of Cahn [2] and …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However the formula for calculating the solute drag for a migrating phase boundary into a multi-component system in steady-state conditions has been a subject of debates over the years and it was only recently that a valid expression has been found with a remarkable amount of empirical insight [11]. The general expression has also been derived in a deductive and completely independent way by applying the principle of maximum dissipation in [12].Even if in the recent years more complex situations than the one treated in the initial works of Cahn [2] and …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if in the recent years more complex situations than the one treated in the initial works of Cahn [2] and Lücke and Stüwe [10] could be tackled, as two different types of solute [13][14], curved interfaces [15], solute drag occurring in a regular solid solution [16], during massive phase transformations [12,[17][18][19][20] or in non-steady state condition [21][22], they rely on the same framework: the composition profile of the solute atoms around the migrating phase boundary is calculated by solving Fick's law for diffusion and then the solute drag stems from the solute profile by applying the appropriate equation. In this paper, however we will limit our discussion to the initial case treated by Cahn [2] and Lücke and Stüwe [10]: a moving grain boundary in a binary solid solution which is supposed ideal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. Lu¨cke and Stu¨we [16], Svoboda et al [8,17], and Odqvist et al [18] demonstrated that transformation kinetics with diffusion processes in the interface (solute drag) playing a role can also be simulated within the framework of linear nonequilibrium thermodynamics by assigning a finite thickness to the interfacial region. The dissipation due to diffusion in the interface depends on the interface velocity, and different interface velocities are obtained by assigning different thicknesses to the interfacial region.…”
Section: Total Dissipation and Rate Of Gibbs Energy For The Sharp Intmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As temperature and pressure are assumed to be constant in the system at least for a limited period of time, the search for the maximum in entropy production can be shifted to that for maximum Gibbs energy dissipation Q. In linear non-equilibrium thermodynamics, the dissipation Q in a system with n degrees of freedom is given by a quadratic form of the rates q ؒ i (7) with B ik being a positive, definite coefficient matrix.…”
Section: Maximum Entropy Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models that take into account all the above-mentioned dissipative processes are presented in the literature [6,7]. However, most of these thick interface-finite mobility (TI-FM) models are confined to steady-state conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%