1988
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620260711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A third‐order semi‐implicit finite difference method for solving the one‐dimensional convection‐diffusion equation

Abstract: SUMMARYA third-order semi-implicit five-point finite difference method is developed to solve the one-dimensional convection-diffusion equation, using the 'weighted' modified equation method. It is shown to have a large stability region, to be very accurate and computationally fast.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the present (9; 5) scheme gives a remarkably accurate solution (with pulse height 0.166325 against the analytical value of 0.166667), free from di usion or anti-di usion, yielding a pulse which is indistinguishable from the exact one as seen from Figure 2(b). It will be worthwhile to compare the CPU time-wise e ciency of the present (9; 5) scheme with the (9; 9) [5] scheme and the nine point scheme of Noye and Tan [6,7] time. The CPU time ratio of the Noye and Tan scheme and (9; 9) [5] scheme to that of FTCS scheme is 447.12 and 5.257, respectively.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, the present (9; 5) scheme gives a remarkably accurate solution (with pulse height 0.166325 against the analytical value of 0.166667), free from di usion or anti-di usion, yielding a pulse which is indistinguishable from the exact one as seen from Figure 2(b). It will be worthwhile to compare the CPU time-wise e ciency of the present (9; 5) scheme with the (9; 9) [5] scheme and the nine point scheme of Noye and Tan [6,7] time. The CPU time ratio of the Noye and Tan scheme and (9; 9) [5] scheme to that of FTCS scheme is 447.12 and 5.257, respectively.…”
Section: Problemmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Various schemes have been developed for problems based on Equation (1). Quite recently, HOC ÿnite di erence methods [2,3,[5][6][7][8][9][11][12][13][14][15] have become quite popular as against the other lower order accurate schemes which require high mesh reÿnement and hence are computationally ine cient. On the other hand, the higher order accuracy of the HOC methods combined with the compactness of the di erence stencil yields highly accurate numerical solutions on relatively coarser grids with greater computational e ciency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several higher order implicit schemes for the one dimensional (1-D) time dependent convection-di usion problems were developed by Noye and Tan [12]. Later on, they also developed a nine-point scheme of third order spatial and second order temporal accuracy for the 2-D convection-di usion equations with constant coe cients [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, due to their high order, compactness and high resolution, we have seen increasing popularity for high-order compact (HOC) difference methods in computational fluid dynamics. After deriving several high-order implicit schemes for unsteady 1-D convection-diffusion equations [10], Noye and Tan proposed a compact nine-point HOC implicit scheme for unsteady 2-D convection-diffusion equations with constant coefficients [11]. The scheme is third-order accurate in space and second-order accurate in time and has a large zone of stability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%