2021
DOI: 10.1177/10556656211062843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Three-Dimensional-Based Morphometric Analysis of a Standardized Overcorrection Technique for Fronto-Orbital Advancement in Metopic Craniosynostosis

Abstract: Introduction The concept of “overcorrection” for trigonocephaly has been reported to achieve both anterior cranial fossa expansion and normalization of craniofacial form. The purpose of this study is to describe in detail a standardized technique to fronto-orbital advancement utilizing the concept of “overcorrection” and objectively evaluate intermediate results. Methods This retrospective study included patients with isolated metopic synostosis who underwent surgery via the proposed surgical technique and age… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reoperation rates are cited as high as 28%,7 with most studies likely underestimating their true reoperation rates due to insufficient follow-up 8,9. The observed rates of esthetic relapse associated with fronto-orbital advancement have prompted many teams to incorporate overcorrection of the fronto-orbital bandeau into their surgical technique, thereby over-expanding the temporal regions and aggressively advancing and widening the fronto-orbital bar within the constraints of the available soft tissue envelope 5,10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Reoperation rates are cited as high as 28%,7 with most studies likely underestimating their true reoperation rates due to insufficient follow-up 8,9. The observed rates of esthetic relapse associated with fronto-orbital advancement have prompted many teams to incorporate overcorrection of the fronto-orbital bandeau into their surgical technique, thereby over-expanding the temporal regions and aggressively advancing and widening the fronto-orbital bar within the constraints of the available soft tissue envelope 5,10…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 The observed rates of esthetic relapse associated with fronto-orbital advancement have prompted many teams to incorporate overcorrection of the fronto-orbital bandeau into their surgical technique, thereby over-expanding the temporal regions and aggressively advancing and widening the fronto-orbital bar within the constraints of the available soft tissue envelope. 5,10 An additional element potential influencing metopic esthetic outcomes is the impact of preoperative phenotypic severity. Previous studies attempting to characterize the relationship between preoperative severity and long-term esthetic outcomes have relied on clinical photographs evaluated by medical students 11 or reductive 2-dimensional measurements from 3-dimensional rendered images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frontal width was described in 6 publications 20,37,40,52,59,60 of which 4 publications described frontotemporal distance 37,40,59,60 . In addition, 2 publications described the interfrontoparietal–interparietal ratio, which focuses on the relative width of the forehead compared with the parietal width 20,52 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have attempted to characterize the morphological bony changes associated with nonsyndromic UCS. [17][18][19][20] Unilateral coronal synostosis has been described with characteristic morphologic associations, including ipsilateral frontal flattening, supraorbital rim retrusion, anterior displacement of midface structures, and decreased orbital size. 5,21 Prior studies have not evaluated the morphometrics of important orbital foramina structures in patients with UCS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%