2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2018.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional computational analysis of bridges subjected to monochromatic wave attack

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the majority of the numerical studies focused on two-dimensional (2D) models, some of them pointed out that the interaction between a deck and the wave is not a completely two-dimensional process, especially when (i) the deck has diaphragms that trap the air [43][44][45], (ii) the elevated slab has air-vents [19], (iii) the deck is skewed [46][47][48], (iv) the wave is oblique [46] or (v) water-borne debris is trapped in front of the deck at an off-center location [49]. For example, Bozognia and Lee [43] showed that simplified 2D simulations of periodic waves impacting a concrete deck with diaphragms, could not represent the motion of air in the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of the numerical studies focused on two-dimensional (2D) models, some of them pointed out that the interaction between a deck and the wave is not a completely two-dimensional process, especially when (i) the deck has diaphragms that trap the air [43][44][45], (ii) the elevated slab has air-vents [19], (iii) the deck is skewed [46][47][48], (iv) the wave is oblique [46] or (v) water-borne debris is trapped in front of the deck at an off-center location [49]. For example, Bozognia and Lee [43] showed that simplified 2D simulations of periodic waves impacting a concrete deck with diaphragms, could not represent the motion of air in the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of 3D effects was also observed experimentally in the case of bridges with air-vents in the deck, for which case the distance of the vents from (i) the diaphragms and (ii) the girders forming the chambers had a critical role [19]. Moreover, Crowley et al [45], who conducted numerical simulations of monochromatic wave impact on bridge decks noticed that both the high-frequency load component and the quasi-static component are affected by trapped air, and that 3D simulations can capture the air movement more realistically than the 2D ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…While the majority of the numerical studies focused on two-dimensional (2D) models, some of them pointed out that the interaction between a deck and the wave is not a completely two-dimensional process, especially when (i) the deck has diaphragms that trap the air [44][45][46], (ii) the elevated slab has air-vents [19], (iii) the deck is skewed [47][48][49] (iv) the wave is oblique [49], or (v) water-borne debris is trapped in front of the deck at an off-center location [50]. For example, Bozognia and Lee [44] showed that simplified 2D simulations of periodic waves impacting a concrete deck with diaphragms, could not represent the motion of air in the longitudinal direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sk and Sε are user-specified source terms. Details about evaluating the turbulence terms are found in a number of references [16]. The models' computational domain consisted of long (approximately 40 m) culvert that emptied into an area with the baffled dam described by [2] as shown on Figure 3.…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamic (Cfd) Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%