Abstract:Implant diameter and length are the most effective parameters affecting stress distribution in surrounding bones. In order to extract simplified design equations to better understand implants behavior, 25 different implant designs with gradual increase in diameter and length were analyzed in 3D using Finite Element Method. Four types of loadings were applied on each design: tension of 50 N, compression of 100 N, bending of 20 N, and torque of 2 Nm to derive design curves.Analysis of results showed that increas… Show more
“…However, evaluating posterior mandibular bone height change after usage of implant supported prostheses either fixed or removable were little in the literature and lack of consistency which might cause researchers to mislead to analyze data from the different studies. [2,9,10,[17][18][19][20] This systematic review was conducted to compare amount of posterior mandibular bone height changes of fixed implant restorations versus implant overdentures. This included only one RCT10 and two prospective cohort studies which are considered of a lower level of evidence than that of RCTs.…”
Introduction: To compare the bone height changes of the posterior mandibular edentulous area of fixed implant prosthesis versus that of removable implant overdentures. Materials & Methods: An electronic search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for articles published in English till the end of November 2016. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PS) which measured the changes of the height of the posterior edentulous area of the mandible. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, made data extraction and appraised the quality of included studies. Results: From a total of six identified relevant studies, two randomized clinical trials and two prospective cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors of the included studies concurred to bone resorption as a result of removable prostheses and advocated to fixed prostheses as it allow for preservation of the bone height and even bone apposition. Conclusion: the implant fixed prosthesis is superior over the implant removable overdentures regarding the preservation of the posterior edentulous bone height.
“…However, evaluating posterior mandibular bone height change after usage of implant supported prostheses either fixed or removable were little in the literature and lack of consistency which might cause researchers to mislead to analyze data from the different studies. [2,9,10,[17][18][19][20] This systematic review was conducted to compare amount of posterior mandibular bone height changes of fixed implant restorations versus implant overdentures. This included only one RCT10 and two prospective cohort studies which are considered of a lower level of evidence than that of RCTs.…”
Introduction: To compare the bone height changes of the posterior mandibular edentulous area of fixed implant prosthesis versus that of removable implant overdentures. Materials & Methods: An electronic search was performed using PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL databases for articles published in English till the end of November 2016. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies (PS) which measured the changes of the height of the posterior edentulous area of the mandible. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts, made data extraction and appraised the quality of included studies. Results: From a total of six identified relevant studies, two randomized clinical trials and two prospective cohort studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The authors of the included studies concurred to bone resorption as a result of removable prostheses and advocated to fixed prostheses as it allow for preservation of the bone height and even bone apposition. Conclusion: the implant fixed prosthesis is superior over the implant removable overdentures regarding the preservation of the posterior edentulous bone height.
“…FEM was applied to investigate the residual shrinkage stress distributions in dental materials [16,17]. Other studies are related to the simulation of dental implant biomechanics, related to the osteointegration and load mechanism transfer in dental implant-supported prostheses [18][19][20]. This methodology was also applied in prosthodontic and endodontic studies [21][22][23].…”
Engineering techniques used to evaluate strain-stress fields, materials' mechanical properties, and load transfer mechanisms, among others, are useful tools in the study of biomechanical applications. These engineering tools,
“…Chang simplified bone structure to a cubic shape, which was covered with a 2 mm layer of cortical bone [12]. El Anwar simplified bone geometry and simulated as a cylinder that consists of two co-axial cylinders [13]. The model may be two-dimensional.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artificial materials for example implant body, abutment and dental crown, can be modeled quite accurately. Materials are considered to be homogenous and isotropic [11][12][13][14]. Loading conditions can be simulated with axial and non-axial forces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Loading conditions can be simulated with axial and non-axial forces. If model consists only of bone and implant body, loading forces act on a crest module [13,14]; if model consists all parts including dental crownloading forces act on the surface of dental crown [12]. Dental implants are subjected to loading conditions from 25 N up to 500 N at 15-45 degrees angle [11][12][13][14].…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.