2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11552-012-9430-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional finite element analysis of finger joint stresses in the MCP joint while performing common tasks

Abstract: The goal of this study was to develop a threedimensional finite element model of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint to characterize joint contact stresses incurred during common daily activities. The metacarpal and proximal phalanx were modeled using a COMSOL-based finite element analysis. Muscle forces determined from a static force analysis of two common activities (pen grip and carrying a weight) were applied to the simulation to characterize the surface stress distributions at the MCP joint. The finite el… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although such models provide estimations of tendon forces and resultant joint contact forces, they neglect the nonlinear deformation of soft tissues and the local stress distribution. Conversely, FE finger models provide estimations of local contact mechanics but focus on a single joint (Hashizume et al 1994), model joints in 2 D (Butz et al 2012a), neglect muscle actions and tendon paths (Butz et al 2012b) and apply nonphysiological boundary conditions (Harih 2019). To take advantage of both approaches, hybrid MSK-FE models have been developed to investigate different musculoskeletal structures, such as the wrist (G ıslason et al 2010), the foot (Isvilanonda et al 2012) or the knee (Besier et al 2005;Halonen et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although such models provide estimations of tendon forces and resultant joint contact forces, they neglect the nonlinear deformation of soft tissues and the local stress distribution. Conversely, FE finger models provide estimations of local contact mechanics but focus on a single joint (Hashizume et al 1994), model joints in 2 D (Butz et al 2012a), neglect muscle actions and tendon paths (Butz et al 2012b) and apply nonphysiological boundary conditions (Harih 2019). To take advantage of both approaches, hybrid MSK-FE models have been developed to investigate different musculoskeletal structures, such as the wrist (G ıslason et al 2010), the foot (Isvilanonda et al 2012) or the knee (Besier et al 2005;Halonen et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this we selected two materials that showed the greatest promise for successful printing and proceeded to optimise the formulations ready for scale up [25][26][27][28] ( Supplementary Table S1): tricyclo[5.2.1.02,6]decanedimethanol diacrylate (TCDMDA) and ethylene glycol dicyclopentenyl ether acrylate (EGDPEA). Sixteen formulations were then investigated where the photoinitiator and the candidate monomers were combined covering a breadth of utility in different environments and potential reaction speeds (Supplementary Table S2) as both could influence the product performance [22,[29][30][31] . Both Norrish type I (nitrogen environment) and Norrish type II (air environment) initiators were evaluated with respect to compatibility of the formulations when processing in different environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structural static analysis was performed to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of the PP1s using the Finite Element Package ANSYS 17.1 in a Dell Precision™ Workstation T5500 with 48 GB and 5.33 GHz. Elastic, linear and homogeneous material properties were assumed for the cortical bone using the values of E (Young's modulus) 18.6 GPa and v (Poisson's ratio) 0.3, while for the trabecular bone values of E (Young's modulus) 0.75 GPa and v (Poisson's ratio) 0.3 were assumed (Butz et al, 2012).…”
Section: Model Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%