2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.00428.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three‐dimensional look for facial differences between males and females in a British‐Caucasian sample aged 15½ years old

Abstract: Differences in facial morphology can be accurately quantified and visualized using 3D imaging technology. This method of facial assessment can be recommended and applied for future research studies to assess facial soft tissue changes because of growth or healthcare intervention.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
59
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
8
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the sample here includes the majority of ongoing active participants in ALSPAC at that age. For the participants who volunteered, three-dimensional facial images were captured using two high-resolution Konica/Minolta laser scanners following the procedure described previously [23,24]. Twenty-one facial landmarks (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) defined by Farkas [25] were then manually delineated on the three-dimensional facial shells and the X, Y and Z coordinates recorded according to procedures detailed in Toma et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the sample here includes the majority of ongoing active participants in ALSPAC at that age. For the participants who volunteered, three-dimensional facial images were captured using two high-resolution Konica/Minolta laser scanners following the procedure described previously [23,24]. Twenty-one facial landmarks (electronic supplementary material, figure S1) defined by Farkas [25] were then manually delineated on the three-dimensional facial shells and the X, Y and Z coordinates recorded according to procedures detailed in Toma et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The facial scan was evaluated as having good quality when the average distance between right and left facial scan is 0.3mm and below and is the most suitable for merging (Kau and Richmond, 2008). Generally, 70–100 per cent overlap of the right and left facial shells with a tolerance level set at 0.5mm indicates facial shells suitable for merging, and any non-suitable scans were excluded from the sample of the study (Toma et al , 2008; Kau and Richmond, 2010). …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For alignment, the mid-endocanthion point (a point halfway between the inner corners of the eyes), which has been found to be the statistically most stable point of the face, was used as the common origin of the x, y, and z axes. 15,16 The transverse, vertical, and sagittal anatomical axes of the head were defined as the x-, y-, and z-axis, respectively. The marked landmarks were used to bring the scans into the same position and give them the same orientation.…”
Section: Soft Tissue Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%