2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.0956-540x.2001.01393.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-dimensional model of the Pyrenean deep structure based on gravity modelling, seismic images and petrological constraints

Abstract: Summary The present study aims at building a 3‐D density model of a whole collisional mountain belt at the lithospheric scale. The geometry of internal structures is constrained by seismic studies, while density values are imposed by petrological considerations. The model must fit both the Bouguer and geoid anomalies. This approach is applied to the Pyrenees, for which numerous geophysical data are available. The crustal structure is constrained from the results of seismic profiles. The most important crustal … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
55
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
6
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The continental collision of Iberia and Europe produced the formation of the Pyrenean orogen with a partial subduction of the Iberian lithosphere to the north (Muñoz, 1992;Roure and Choukroune, 1998;Beaumont et al, 2000). This possibility was confirmed by the magnetotelluric survey along the ECORS profile (Vacher and Souriau, 2001). These studies shows a steep north-dipping, high conductivity body, which reaches a depth of about 70 km and has been interpreted as subducted partly melted lower crust and lithospheric mantle.…”
Section: The Atlas Belt In the Mediterranean Collision Zone (Mcz)supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The continental collision of Iberia and Europe produced the formation of the Pyrenean orogen with a partial subduction of the Iberian lithosphere to the north (Muñoz, 1992;Roure and Choukroune, 1998;Beaumont et al, 2000). This possibility was confirmed by the magnetotelluric survey along the ECORS profile (Vacher and Souriau, 2001). These studies shows a steep north-dipping, high conductivity body, which reaches a depth of about 70 km and has been interpreted as subducted partly melted lower crust and lithospheric mantle.…”
Section: The Atlas Belt In the Mediterranean Collision Zone (Mcz)supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Thus, Torne et al (1989) interpreted the anomaly as either a relatively shallow (from 1 to 12 km) narrow highdensity body (2930 kg m -3 ) corresponding to a slice of lower crust, based on seismic fabrics, or to various intracrustal mantle slices in agreement with the presence of outcropping lherzolites. Vacher and Souriau (2001), from 3D gravity modeling and considering previous results from Souriau and Granet (1995), concluded that the Labourd Massif anomaly may be explained by the presence of a high-density body (2930 to 2950 kg m -3 ) that extends to 12 km depth, becoming laterally wider below 7 km and then narrowing again until a depth of 12 km. The Saint-Gaudens anomaly is attributed to the presence of a high density block about 60 km long, 25 km wide and extending from 7 to 15 km (Vacher and Souriau, 2001).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…10a). Vacher and Souriau (2001) pointed out the extent of these positive anomalies in the Bouguer anomaly map (Labourd Massif and Saint-Gaudens in the east) (see Fig. 5) as was already defined in tomography studies carried out by Souriau and Granet (1995).…”
Section: The Pyrenees (F1 and F2)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The thick crustal root beneath the axial zone also provides an explanation for the pronounced negative Bouguer anomaly observed along most of the Pyrenean range, except in its eastern termination close to the Mediterranean Sea (Daignières et al 1982). The Labourd and Saint Gaudens positive anomalies have been attributed to the presence of dense materials at shallow levels , but their exact nature and geometry are still uncertain (Torné et al 1989;Casas et al 1997;Vacher & Souriau 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%