2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-gene phylogeny of the Mycena pura complex reveals 11 phylogenetic species and shows ITS to be unreliable for species identification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in this study some of the morphotypes had identical sequences, although morphological differences were strong enough to keep them as separate species. Insufficiency of ITS sequences to separate fungal species has also been reported for other fungal species complexes 18, 19 . In contrast, intra-generic diversity of the ITS region of Diaporthe ( Phomopsis ) was high leading to the recognition of seven different species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…However, in this study some of the morphotypes had identical sequences, although morphological differences were strong enough to keep them as separate species. Insufficiency of ITS sequences to separate fungal species has also been reported for other fungal species complexes 18, 19 . In contrast, intra-generic diversity of the ITS region of Diaporthe ( Phomopsis ) was high leading to the recognition of seven different species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…) and there are cases where the ITS region shows larger within‐species variation, compared to between‐species distance, than single‐copy genes (Harder et al . ). Further studies are needed to determine how well suited the coalescence model is to model the evolution of the ITS region.…”
Section: The Probability Of Splitting Speciesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We thus aligned our ITS sequences with representative sequences from GenBank for sect. Purae benefitting from recently published phylogenetic studies (Harder et al 2010(Harder et al , 2013 and the authoritative but apparently problematic Mycena sequences from the Venice barcode project (Osmundson et al 2013). Our phylogenetic analyses (Fig.…”
Section: Mycenamentioning
confidence: 99%