2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2010.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three-parameter magnitude phase function for asteroids

Abstract: International audienceWe develop a three-parameter H, G1, G2 magnitude phase function for asteroids starting from the current two-parameter , H, G phase function. We describe stochastic optimization of the basis functions of the magnitude phase function based on a carefully chosen set of asteroid photometric observations covering the principal types of phase dependencies. We then illustrate the magnitude phase function with a chosen set of observations. It is shown that the H, G1 Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
218
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(227 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
8
218
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used the value of 0.15 as the default value for the slope parameter G (Bowell et al 1989). This G value is also consistent with the published value of G ( -+ 0.12 0.03 0.04 ) for Psyche in the Asteroid Absolute Magnitude and Slope Catalog (Muinonen et al 2010;Oszkiewicz et al 2011). Figure 1(a) shows the effect of changing the beaming parameter thermal corrections in Psyche's spectra.…”
Section: Thermal Tail Removalsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…We used the value of 0.15 as the default value for the slope parameter G (Bowell et al 1989). This G value is also consistent with the published value of G ( -+ 0.12 0.03 0.04 ) for Psyche in the Asteroid Absolute Magnitude and Slope Catalog (Muinonen et al 2010;Oszkiewicz et al 2011). Figure 1(a) shows the effect of changing the beaming parameter thermal corrections in Psyche's spectra.…”
Section: Thermal Tail Removalsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Using the H-G 12 conventions for sparse and low-accuracy photometric data (Muinonen et al 2010), we find H R = 19.2 mag and H V = 19.8 mag, with large uncertainties which could easily be up to one magnitude (conservative estimate based on fitting various phase functions (H-G, H-G 12 , H-G 1 -G 2 ) and taking the whole range of all possible solutions and uncertainties into account). The determination of the object's V-R colour is more reliable and based on different calculations and different data sets, we find a V-R colour of 0.56 ± 0.05 mag.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can now also determine the bolometric Bond albedo A. The uncertainty in G translates into an uncertainty in the phase integral q (Bowell et al 1989), combined with a 5% accuracy of the q − G relation (Muinonen et al 2010), we obtain a Bond albedo of A = q · p V = 0.14 +0.03 −0.04 . Figures 7 and 8 show our best-model solution at intermediate-roughness level in different representations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%