2007
DOI: 10.1002/cyto.a.20281
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A three‐symbol code for organized proteomes based on cyclical imaging of protein locations

Abstract: Background: A major challenge in the post genomic era is to map and decipher the functional molecular networks of proteins directly in a cell or a tissue. This task requires technologies for the colocalization of random numbers of different molecular components (e.g. proteins) in one sample in one experiment. Methods: Multi‐epitope‐ligand‐“kartographie” (MELK) was developed as a microscopic imaging technology running cycles of iterative fluorescence tagging, imaging, and bleaching, to colocalize a large number… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Illustration of the topological hierarchies of proteins within the toponome. L, lead protein (common to all CMPs of a CMP motif); A, absent protein signal (absent in all CMPs of a CMP motif); W, wild card protein signals (proteins that are variably associated with the (L) and the (A) proteins of a CMP motif) (from Schubert, 2007a). or, after introducing a threshold for each signal, as a combinatorial binary code. In either of these cases all existing signal combinations (indicating protein clusters) can be assembled in what we call a toponome map, visualizing the location of given protein clusters present in groups of pixels or voxels, referred to as combinatorial molecular phenotypes (CMPs) (Fig.…”
Section: From Images To Toponome Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Illustration of the topological hierarchies of proteins within the toponome. L, lead protein (common to all CMPs of a CMP motif); A, absent protein signal (absent in all CMPs of a CMP motif); W, wild card protein signals (proteins that are variably associated with the (L) and the (A) proteins of a CMP motif) (from Schubert, 2007a). or, after introducing a threshold for each signal, as a combinatorial binary code. In either of these cases all existing signal combinations (indicating protein clusters) can be assembled in what we call a toponome map, visualizing the location of given protein clusters present in groups of pixels or voxels, referred to as combinatorial molecular phenotypes (CMPs) (Fig.…”
Section: From Images To Toponome Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the three symbols code (LAW, Fig. 2) (Schubert, 2007a), differences of cell states and cell types can be readily identified in studies comparing large experiments, or, diseases with normal conditions. The TIS technology is unparalleled when it comes to the colocalization of a very large number of proteins using photonic microscopy.…”
Section: From Images To Toponome Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We tested the frequencies of co-localization of pZAP70 and pSLP76 in synaptic areas that were also positive for pLAT and CD3 (pCD3[Y5]). The use of binarized imaging data resulting from the thresholding of fluorescent signals was not only useful in evaluating low-intensity signals of individual markers, but could also be used to generate and quantify CMP motifs (25,42,43), patterns of localizations of several markers within one spot (pixel). Although it is conceptually easier to think of a CMP motif as a protein complex, MELC analysis does not provide data on actual binding between proteins-only on shared locations.…”
Section: Distinct Phases Of Molecular Recruitment and Colocalization mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details regarding this technology and the tasks associated with the data obtained by using it are discussed in Cottingham (2008) and Sage (2009); for biological applications of MELK Technology, see Schubert et al (2009), Schubert et al (2008a,b), Bode et al (2008) and Schubert (2007b). This technique produces a whole stack of intensity images of one and the same biological object (for example, a slice of nervous tissue), each image in the stack corresponding to one particular protein (or any other biologically relevant molecule of interest).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%