“…do not specify basic personal safety requirements for apparatus under fault conditions [77], [78] Modeling lumped equivalent circuits and transfer functions like EM topology [83], [84] cannot cover the frequency range, obtain proper transfer functions, and add any new parameters EMI issue from Pantograph-Catenary Arcing (transient disturbance EMI issue) [29], [85], [86] the only model construction for EMI issue and only based on GSM-R communication system Mitigation suppression techniques, including passive filter, Wheatstone bridge balance, active filter, and optimized modulation, related to hardware electrical equipment [87]- [90] unsuitable for the railway domain or the field of telecommunications Detection statistics-based and threshold detection (capture the temporal and spectral information with time and frequency analysis) [91]- [94] cannot analyze multiple indicators and distinguish attacks in real time IEMI classification methods, either binary or multiple classifications [95] efficiency is low and needs a long processing time with a huge amount of data Mitigation increasing transmitted power to increase SIR, switching from the train front antenna to the train rear antenna to increase attenuation, and using a high front-to-back ratio train antenna [73] Mainly physical methods to mitigate the impact and lack consideration about the specific telecommunication field in the railway systems [26], [96] in the above three spaces. Therefore, each disturbance generated in the EM environment interacts with the EMU and ultimately interferes with the OTCS equipment in HSR, as illustrated in Fig.…”