2020
DOI: 10.26599/tst.2019.9010007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-aware dynamic service quality prediction approach for services

Abstract: Dynamic Quality of Service (QoS) prediction for services is currently a hot topic and a challenge for research in the fields of service recommendation and composition. Our paper addresses the problem with a Time-aWare service Quality Prediction method (named TWQP), a two-phase approach with one phase based on historical time slices and one on the current time slice. In the first phase, if the user had invoked the service in a previous time slice, the QoS value for the user calling the service on the next time … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Mahalanobis Distance requires additional time cost to compute the covariance matrix of different dimensions; therefore, its time complexity is not very low. While time cost is critical for real world applications especially for the big data scenario [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Therefore, we would continuously refine our algorithm to further reduce its time costs so as to meet the quick response requirements from users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Mahalanobis Distance requires additional time cost to compute the covariance matrix of different dimensions; therefore, its time complexity is not very low. While time cost is critical for real world applications especially for the big data scenario [29][30][31][32][33][34][35] . Therefore, we would continuously refine our algorithm to further reduce its time costs so as to meet the quick response requirements from users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we use a cross-validation method to verify the calculation results returned by the computing party, which causes the client to pay the calculation fee to the two computing parties, which is very expensive for the client. One future direction would be to combine the time prediction [42] with the measurement of the participant's behavioral uncertainty [43], to verify the computing party with a high reputation with a low verification probability, and reduce the computation cost to a computing party. Another future direction would be to extend our scheme to the rational delegation of computation like [23].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommender systems are actually a kind of decisionmaking problem that involves users, multiple influencing factors and so on [24][25][26][27][28][29] . In the future work, we will further discuss multi-factor recommendation problems for users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%