2014
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2014.006507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-domain finite element boundary integration method for ultrasonic nondestructive evaluation

Abstract: A 2D and 3D numerical modelling approach for calculating the elastic wave scattering signals from complex stress-free defects is evaluated. In this method, an efficient boundary integration across the complex boundary of the defect is coupled with a time domain finite element (FE) solver. The model is designed to simulate time domain ultrasonic non-destructive evaluation (NDE) in bulk media. This approach makes use of the hybrid concept of linking a local numerical model to compute the near field scattering be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We are now in a position to sidestep these limitations and perform highly accurate numerical simulations in three dimensions due to recent advances such as hybrid methods [13,14]. We have been motivated to explore the validity of Kirchhoff theory in three dimensions as researchers developing modelling tools using three-dimensional (3D) KA for NDE in the power industry have observed significant differences of several dB between experimentally measured reflections from rough defects and KA simulations of the same cases [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are now in a position to sidestep these limitations and perform highly accurate numerical simulations in three dimensions due to recent advances such as hybrid methods [13,14]. We have been motivated to explore the validity of Kirchhoff theory in three dimensions as researchers developing modelling tools using three-dimensional (3D) KA for NDE in the power industry have observed significant differences of several dB between experimentally measured reflections from rough defects and KA simulations of the same cases [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To model the diffuse scattering from rough boundaries, it has been necessary to utilize sophisticated numerical techniques that have been developed recently, 55 based around the finite-element (FE) method Pettit et al (2015); Shi et al (2014), the Green's function method Zhao and Freund (2009), and molecular dynamic model Liang et al (2014). These numerical methods require considerable computation resources and it is not easy to generalize conclusions of how the surface statistics affect the scattering beyond the specific cases simulated un-60 less the statistics are gathered from many multiples of such simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each realization of the surface a purely numerical method, the finite element boundary integral (FEBI) approach Shi et al (2015Shi et al ( , 2014, is performed to compute σ sc . The FEBI method is highly efficient as it computes the very local scattering field on the 190 interface using an explicit time domain FE scheme inside a small domain, and then performs a boundary integral to globally calculate the scattered waves.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress has been made in developing full-wave scattering models based on hybrid FEM techniques [1]. However, similar progress has not been achieved in developing boundary integral equation techniques, with the main problem being the large simulation time and memory requirement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%