2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-003-1704-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time of promise, a time of promises: ethical issues in advancing psychopharmacological research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most observers conclude that placebo-controlled trials are justified (Vitiello 2003;Derivan et al 2004;Roberts and Krystal 2003). However, some investigators contend that we should move toward comparison of the two active treatments in part because of the concern about parental acceptance of placebo assignment (Gilbert and Buncher 2005).…”
Section: Influence Of Placebo Assignment and Treatment Responsementioning
confidence: 92%
“…Most observers conclude that placebo-controlled trials are justified (Vitiello 2003;Derivan et al 2004;Roberts and Krystal 2003). However, some investigators contend that we should move toward comparison of the two active treatments in part because of the concern about parental acceptance of placebo assignment (Gilbert and Buncher 2005).…”
Section: Influence Of Placebo Assignment and Treatment Responsementioning
confidence: 92%
“…One mentor gave me the courage to serve as a guest editor for a special issue of a major journal when I was a first-year psychiatry resident [4]. Editors in chief of many different journals have across time given me the chance to work on special theme issues with them, providing much guidance and wisdom along the way [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. Another mentor gave me extraordinary opportunities to learn about editing and stepped in at just the right time with just the right advice ("something worth having is worth fighting for") when I was feeling a bit dispirited by the "hard ball" process associated with the national selection of a journal editor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%