2002
DOI: 10.1080/00036840210128753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time preference measure of the social discount rate for the UK

Abstract: In this study the social discount rate for the UK is estimated, the result compared with the Treasury approved rate and the main associated policy implications considered. A case is argued for reducing the official discount rate in appraisals involving all long-term social projects. The estimate of the elasticity of the marginal utility of consumption, an important component of the discount rate, is supported by plausible and statistically valid regression results. The need for further work relating to other m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 The classic source for estimates of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is Stern (1977). Recent reviews include Cowell and Gardiner (1999), Pearce and Ulph (1999), and Evans and Sezer (2002).…”
Section: The Consumption-based Term Structure Of Discount Ratesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3 The classic source for estimates of the elasticity of intertemporal substitution is Stern (1977). Recent reviews include Cowell and Gardiner (1999), Pearce and Ulph (1999), and Evans and Sezer (2002).…”
Section: The Consumption-based Term Structure Of Discount Ratesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A number of studies such as Kula (1984 and, Evans and Sezer (2002), Evans (2005), and Percoco (2008) have adopted this approach; ii) Specifying a benchmark financial rate approach which is based on the long-term treasury interest rates. This method is adopted by the US Office of Management and Budget.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Period 1 is taken to be the second quarter of 1996 while period 2 is its fourth quarter. The discount factor for half a year is set to δ=0.99, which is in line with the estimates for the UK during the time period considered in our simulation (Evans and Sezer ). Consumption is measured by the total UK usage of beef and veal (DEFRA ).…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%