1999
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0084.00141
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Time Series Analysis of U.K. Lottery Sales: Long and Short Run Price Elasticities

Abstract: This paper estimates the long‐ and short‐run elasticities for Lotto. It is particularly concerned with the dynamic response to price variations since, for some goods, this has sometimes been used to infer the presence of addiction. The price elasticity is identified through variation in the expected value of a Lotto ticket induced by rollovers whose high frequency results in surprisingly high variation in the expected value of holding a ticket. Unit root tests are applied to the series in order to identify the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
58
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…37 of a winning lottery ticket, lottery purchases in the zip code of the winning sale increase by 14%, and approximately half of this increase remains six months later. Farrell et al (1999) similarly find evidence for habit formation in time-series analysis of aggregate U.K. lottery data.Another possible explanation for lottery participation is that households perceive the probability of winning the lottery to be higher than the objective probability. Relatedly, households that correctly perceive the win probability may nonetheless make decisions as if it were higher, as modeled by the prospect theory probability weighting function.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…37 of a winning lottery ticket, lottery purchases in the zip code of the winning sale increase by 14%, and approximately half of this increase remains six months later. Farrell et al (1999) similarly find evidence for habit formation in time-series analysis of aggregate U.K. lottery data.Another possible explanation for lottery participation is that households perceive the probability of winning the lottery to be higher than the objective probability. Relatedly, households that correctly perceive the win probability may nonetheless make decisions as if it were higher, as modeled by the prospect theory probability weighting function.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…The estimated effect of addiction, obtained as the sum of the coefficients of the lag endogenous variables varies from 0.171 to 0.360 depending on the subsample considered (from 0.226 to 0.485 in the case of the effective price model). These values are similar to those obtained by Farrell et al (1999) for the British lotto but slightly smaller than 0.45, which is the addiction effect found by Becker et al (1994) for the demand for tobacco.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Additionally, it would be interesting to analyse the separability of the expenditure on these games by families with respect to other types of expenditures, in order to be more precise about the implications of changing the structure of the game and that of the prizes. 3 See Cook and Clotfelter (1993), Gulley and Scott (1993), Scott and Gulley (1995), Walker (1998), Farrell et al (1999) and Forrest et al (2000) as examples of empirical applications of the effective price model to for the analysis of the determinants of lotto sales.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This 'long-shot' bias is evident in other types of gambling (Forrest 2003). Empirical studies show that rollovers (when nobody wins the top prize and the jackpot is added to the jackpot of the next draw) raise sales not only for the draw in question but also for successive draws (Farrell, Morgenroth and Walker 2000). This is referred to as the 'halo' effect in the industry.…”
Section: The Market For Lotteriesmentioning
confidence: 99%