2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2007.01.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
1,346
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,994 publications
(1,365 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
11
1,346
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Representative classes of time-integration schemes embedded in the GL method consist of implicit multistep methods such as Adams-Moulton (AM) [22] and backward differentiation (BDF) methods [13,20,21], implicit multistage Runge-Kutta schemes such as diagonally (DIRK) and singly-diagonally (SDIRK) implicit Runge-Kutta schemes [3,19,59], explicit multistep methods, such as leapfrog and Adams-Bashforth methods [28,43], explicit Runge-Kutta schemes, such as the fourthorder Runge-Kutta scheme [55] and partitioned methods, such as Implicit-Explicit (IMEX) schemes, whereby the operators are linearized in some fashion with-e.g., two Butcher tableaux, one explicit and one implicit [5,40,106]. While EBTI schemes are widely used in computational fluid dynamics, especially in the engineering sector [18,52], their adoption in the weather and climate communities has been less widespread, with SE schemes [54,88,107] and horizontally-explicit vertically-implicit schemes [8,40,63]-i.e., schemes where the horizontal direction is treated explicitly and the vertical is treated implicitly-becoming more prominent but still confined mainly to research and limited-area models (with very few exceptions-see Table 1). Within this context, Eq.…”
Section: Eulerian-based Time-integration (Ebti)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Representative classes of time-integration schemes embedded in the GL method consist of implicit multistep methods such as Adams-Moulton (AM) [22] and backward differentiation (BDF) methods [13,20,21], implicit multistage Runge-Kutta schemes such as diagonally (DIRK) and singly-diagonally (SDIRK) implicit Runge-Kutta schemes [3,19,59], explicit multistep methods, such as leapfrog and Adams-Bashforth methods [28,43], explicit Runge-Kutta schemes, such as the fourthorder Runge-Kutta scheme [55] and partitioned methods, such as Implicit-Explicit (IMEX) schemes, whereby the operators are linearized in some fashion with-e.g., two Butcher tableaux, one explicit and one implicit [5,40,106]. While EBTI schemes are widely used in computational fluid dynamics, especially in the engineering sector [18,52], their adoption in the weather and climate communities has been less widespread, with SE schemes [54,88,107] and horizontally-explicit vertically-implicit schemes [8,40,63]-i.e., schemes where the horizontal direction is treated explicitly and the vertical is treated implicitly-becoming more prominent but still confined mainly to research and limited-area models (with very few exceptions-see Table 1). Within this context, Eq.…”
Section: Eulerian-based Time-integration (Ebti)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A SE approach has been adopted in a number of active research and operational limited-area atmospheric models: the JMA's non-hydrostatic Mesoscale Model (JMA-NHM) continues to use a leapfrog-based approach for the long time-step integrations, but includes some low-order advection components in the short time-step computations to improve the computational stability [79,80]. Other groups have moved towards single-time-level, multistage explicit Runge-Kutta schemes to integrate the slow components-both the COSMO [6,7] and WRF [56,88] models use a 3-stage 3rd-order Runge-Kutta (RK) scheme for integrating the slow components, retaining the forward-backward and trapezoidal schemes (previously described) for the fast components (following the analyses of RK methods for timesplitting in [108,109]). Figure 3b illustrates the 3-stage RK-based approach.…”
Section: Split-explicit Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Winds were taken from a custom downscaling of NCEP NFL boundary conditions using the WRF model (Skamarock et al, 2008) to a sub-4 km grid size. Drift scenarios were run by stepping forward in time from hypothetical sites and times of mortality.…”
Section: Analysis For Toxins (Pst/ast)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MM5 is the fifth-generation NCAR/Penn State non-hydrostatic mesoscale model [Dudhia et al, 2002] and WRF is the Weather Research and Forecast model [Skamarock et al, 2008]. The surface forcing was created with a horizontal resolution of 9 km using MM5 for 1978-2006 and then using WRF with the same spatial resolution for 2007-2013.…”
Section: Necofsmentioning
confidence: 99%