2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2005.05702.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tissue‐engineered suburethral sling in an animal model of stress urinary incontinence

Abstract: of a tissue-engineered sling. The suburethral sling was placed via a transabdominal approach with the sling sutured to the pubic bone. Tissue-engineered slings were prepared with muscle-derived cells obtained via the pre-plate technique and subsequently seeded for 2 weeks on a SIS scaffold. Suburethral slings were implanted 2 weeks before LPP testing, using the vertical-tilt method. RESULTSSurgically placing a suburethral sling is feasible in the female rat, with few complications. LPPs from both sling groups … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Therefore, an animal model of a rat sling procedure has been developed for use in investigative studies, 13,14,49 resulting in increased urethral resistance in the short and long term. 13,14,49 In an experiment in which the suburethral portion of the sling was cut immediately after placement LPP 6 weeks later was significantly higher than in a sham sling preparation and comparable to that in an intact sling preparation. 50 Peak micturition pressure was not significantly different among the 3 groups, indicating the absence of bladder outlet obstruction after the sling procedure.…”
Section: Treatment Testing Slingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Therefore, an animal model of a rat sling procedure has been developed for use in investigative studies, 13,14,49 resulting in increased urethral resistance in the short and long term. 13,14,49 In an experiment in which the suburethral portion of the sling was cut immediately after placement LPP 6 weeks later was significantly higher than in a sham sling preparation and comparable to that in an intact sling preparation. 50 Peak micturition pressure was not significantly different among the 3 groups, indicating the absence of bladder outlet obstruction after the sling procedure.…”
Section: Treatment Testing Slingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several kinds of methods for measuring the LPP have been developed in animal experiments (3,7,8,14,15,24); however, these methods are not accompanied by an abrupt increment of abdominal pressure, except for the sneeze LPP (7,15). In this study, a unique method for evaluating the urethral resistance during momentary elevation of abdominal pressure by electrical stimulation of the abdominal muscles was developed, the role of nervemediated urethral closing reflexes in the urethral resistance under momentary stress condition was clarified, and the effects of duloxetine on the reflex urethral closure and the urethral resistance were studied.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abdominal leak point pressure is a test assessing the function of the urethra. Maximum urethral closure pressure and leak point pressure have been used to determine the severity of incontinence, the guidelines for therapy, and the evaluation of treatment outcomes [5,21]. The reflex activity of the bladder to urethra contributes to the maintenance of high leak point pressure during abdominal compression and increases passive intravesical pressure [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%