A Tool and Process that Facilitate Community Capacity Building and Social Learning for Natural Resource Management

Abstract

ABSTRACT. This study presents a self-assessment tool and process that facilitate community capacity building and social learning for natural resource management. The tool and process provide opportunities for rural landholders and project teams both to self-assess their capacity to plan and deliver natural resource management (NRM) programs and to reflect on their capacities relative to other organizations and institutions that operate in their region. We first outline the tool and process and then present a critical review of the pilot in the South Australian Arid Lands NRM region, South Australia. Results indicate that participants representing local, organizational, and institutional tiers of government were able to arrive at a group consensus position on the strength, importance, and confidence of a variety of capacities for NRM categorized broadly as human, social, physical, and financial. During the process, participants learned a lot about their current capacity as well as capacity needs. Broad conclusions are discussed with reference to the iterative process for assessing and reflecting on community capacity.

Measuring the dimensions of adaptive capacity: a psychometric approach

“…Assessments of adaptive capacity have used a range of techniques including inductive theory driven approaches (Pelling et al 2008, Gupta et al 2010; assessment of secondary data sources (Adger and Vincent 2005, Brooks et al 2005, Adger 2006, Smit and Wandel 2006, Eriksen and Kelly 2007; self-assessment processes (Brown et al 2010, Raymond andCleary 2013); and futures modelling (Bussey et al 2012).…”

Developing adaptive capacity in times of climate change in central rural Vietnam: exploring smallholders’ learning and governance

“…Building adaptive capacity is best described as a dynamic social process (Raymond & Cleary, 2013). Key conditions for adaptive capacity discussed in the scholarly literature include the presence of social learning and knowledge exchange, empowerment of actors and the bridging of social networks that link stakeholders and their resources across administrative levels and spatial scales .…”

“…To keep their motivation high, the contents and methods of learning need to support farmer's attempts to modify existing practices and there needs to be possibilities for them to share their experiences (Grothmann et al, 2013;Raymond & Cleary, 2013).…”

“…There is a general consensus and convincing empirical evidence that AC and SL are intricately linked (Raymond & Cleary, 2013;Yuen et al, 2013). However, the current knowledge about the nature and influence of the interplay between AC and SL is fragmented across academic scholarship.…”

“…Therefore, interest in social learning as a part of the response to the challenges of climate change adaptation has grown significantly in recent years (Ensor & Harvey, 2015). Many social and technical interventions have been designed to support and increase farmer's adaptive capacity to deal with climate change (Bloch et al, 2016;Duru et al, 2012;Johnson et al, 2012;Mishra et al, 2013;Raymond & Cleary, 2013). For example, introducing agronomic crop management has increased local farmers' capacity to adapt to drought in Thailand through enhancing crop and water productivity along with soil fertility with relatively low input-use (Mishra et al, 2013).…”