2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12524-017-0685-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Tool Assessing Optimal Multi-Scale Image Segmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To treat this issue, unsupervised segmentation parameter optimization (USPO) methods have been developed and are particularly important in the context of increasing data loads and automation purposes [14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. To identify optimal segmentation parameters, USPO procedures usually employ a combination of geospatial metrics that describe spectral heterogeneity between and within image segments [9,[26][27][28]. Espindola et al [19] suggested the use of Global Moran's I Index (MI) to measure inter-segment spectral homogeneity and area-weighted segment variance (WV) to measure intra-segment heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To treat this issue, unsupervised segmentation parameter optimization (USPO) methods have been developed and are particularly important in the context of increasing data loads and automation purposes [14,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. To identify optimal segmentation parameters, USPO procedures usually employ a combination of geospatial metrics that describe spectral heterogeneity between and within image segments [9,[26][27][28]. Espindola et al [19] suggested the use of Global Moran's I Index (MI) to measure inter-segment spectral homogeneity and area-weighted segment variance (WV) to measure intra-segment heterogeneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the value is, more compact the objects will be [33]. Several methods exist to select an optimal scale parameter, of which plateau objective function [31,32] and optimal scale parameter selector [34] have mostly been used. However, obtaining a desired scale for all the landslide types in an area is difficult, thus over-segmentation is preferred to under-segmentation [35].…”
Section: Landslide Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martha et al [32] identified new landslides by comparing the preand post-landslide Resourcesat-2 images with a detection accuracy of 81%. Mohan Vamsee et al [34] improved the scale component of MRS technique and developed the optimal scale parameter selector (OSPS) tool, which was applied to Uttarakhand region using Resourcesat-2 images.…”
Section: Landslide Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the value, more compact the objects will be. There are many methods for selecting the optimal scale automatically, such as estimation of scale parameter 2 [84], plateau objective function [42] and optimal scale parameter selector [85]. However, currently there is no standardized or best method for optimal scale estimation [86].…”
Section: Landslide Inventory Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%