2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2020.103569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A tool-based hybrid laser-electrochemical micromachining process: Experimental investigations and synergistic effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nearly 25% reduction in passivation layer was observed for Ti6Al4V with laser-ECM as compared to the ECM process However, this was not the case with WC and NbC where there was no difference in the oxygen content of the surface with ECM and laser-ECM as observed from EDX analysis. The weakening of oxide layer is also seen up to a specific laser pulse energy (45 µJ, in the reported experimental configuration 13 ). When comparing laser-ECM to ECM for the given experimental parameters, a 6.03%, 7% and 9.5% rise in average volumetric MRR (material removal rate) has been observed for effective laser pulse energies of 10, 36 and 60 μJ, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nearly 25% reduction in passivation layer was observed for Ti6Al4V with laser-ECM as compared to the ECM process However, this was not the case with WC and NbC where there was no difference in the oxygen content of the surface with ECM and laser-ECM as observed from EDX analysis. The weakening of oxide layer is also seen up to a specific laser pulse energy (45 µJ, in the reported experimental configuration 13 ). When comparing laser-ECM to ECM for the given experimental parameters, a 6.03%, 7% and 9.5% rise in average volumetric MRR (material removal rate) has been observed for effective laser pulse energies of 10, 36 and 60 μJ, respectively.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…When comparing laser-ECM to ECM for the given experimental parameters, a 6.03%, 7% and 9.5% rise in average volumetric MRR (material removal rate) has been observed for effective laser pulse energies of 10, 36 and 60 μJ, respectively. The MRR starts to drop with further increase in laser pulse energy beyond 60 μJ 13 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A wide range of hard yet conductive materials such as bulk metallic glasses [ 4 ], titanium alloys [ 5 ], superalloys [ 6 ], carbide-metals [ 7 , 8 ] can be effectively machined by ECMM. Several configurations of ECMM process such as jet electrochemical machining [ 9 ], scanning micro-electrochemical flow cell based ECMM [ 10 ], wire electrochemical micromachining [ 11 ], a tool-based hybrid laser-ECM [ 12 ] and through-mask electrochemical micro-machining [ 13 ] have been introduced to generate surface microstructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several ECMM based new processes have been introduced such as Scanning micro-electrochemical flow cell based micromachining which has capability to fabricate micro-dimples and at the same time confining electrolyte to a droplet [ 10 ]. Similarly, a tool-based hybrid laser-electrochemical micromachining process proposed in Reference [ 12 ] which has capability to fabricate hierarchical microcavities in single-step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%