2016
DOI: 10.1193/040214eqs044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Toolkit for Performing FEMA P-695 Evaluations

Abstract: The FEMA P-695 Methodology offers a procedure for evaluating the collapse performance of seismic force resisting systems. The Methodology is necessarily complex and analysis-intensive. To manage collapse evaluation data and expedite nonlinear dynamic analyses, a Toolkit was created that streamlines the process using seven graphical user interface modules. The modules step the user through the FEMA P-695 process, culminating in a summary table of the evaluation results. The Toolkit is beneficial for engineers w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the 2D model, each ground motion was applied independently, resulting in 44 earthquake runs at each intensity level increment. The ground motions were first normalized per FEMA P695 using the FEMA 695 Toolkit [25], and then the suite was further scaled (i.e., anchored) such that the median of the suite equals the risktargeted maximum considered earthquake (MCER) at the fundamental period of the building (i.e., in this case, taken as CuTa -defined in ASCE 7).…”
Section: Incremental Dynamic Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the 2D model, each ground motion was applied independently, resulting in 44 earthquake runs at each intensity level increment. The ground motions were first normalized per FEMA P695 using the FEMA 695 Toolkit [25], and then the suite was further scaled (i.e., anchored) such that the median of the suite equals the risktargeted maximum considered earthquake (MCER) at the fundamental period of the building (i.e., in this case, taken as CuTa -defined in ASCE 7).…”
Section: Incremental Dynamic Analysis Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%