2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10693-015-0228-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Top-down Approach to Stress-testing Banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although traditional CAMELS indicators are found to be successful in anticipating bank failures in the U.S., Canbas et al (2005) found that these criteria did not maintain a oneto-one correspondence with the specific financial characteristics for Turkish commercial banks due to different applications of bank regulatory and supervisory actions. Kapinos and Mitnik (2016) proposed a simple method for stress-testing banks using a top-down approach that captured the heterogeneous impact of shocks to macroeconomic variables on banks' capitalization. They performed a principal component analysis on the selected variables and showed how the principal component factors can be used to make projections, conditional on exogenous paths of macroeconomic variables.…”
Section: Review Of Predicting Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although traditional CAMELS indicators are found to be successful in anticipating bank failures in the U.S., Canbas et al (2005) found that these criteria did not maintain a oneto-one correspondence with the specific financial characteristics for Turkish commercial banks due to different applications of bank regulatory and supervisory actions. Kapinos and Mitnik (2016) proposed a simple method for stress-testing banks using a top-down approach that captured the heterogeneous impact of shocks to macroeconomic variables on banks' capitalization. They performed a principal component analysis on the selected variables and showed how the principal component factors can be used to make projections, conditional on exogenous paths of macroeconomic variables.…”
Section: Review Of Predicting Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the results of our analysis, which accounts for the heterogeneity of banks as in for example, Kapinos and Mitnik (2016), presented in Table 5, the small banks exhibit the highest TCR and CAP (the bank capital to assets ratio), which is supported by the lowest probability of failing, while their beta, expected loss, and full cost are intermediate between those of the medium and large banks (similar to e.g., Capponi et al, 2017; DeYoung et al, 2018; Leanza et al, 2021). In the case of the large banks, one observes the highest probability of failure and beta and the lowest capital ratios, expected losses and full cost.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study found that the results become more accurate when the additional variables are included. Kapinos and Mitnik (2016) found that the top-down approach to stress testing banks in the USA can be used to examine the banks solvency. Cleary and Hebb (2016) examined the failures of 132 American banks during the period 2002-2009 using discriminant analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%