2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-90353-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A top-down measure of gene-to-gene coordination for analyzing cell-to-cell variability

Abstract: Recent technological advances, such as single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), allow the measurement of gene expression profiles of individual cells. These expression profiles typically exhibit substantial variations even across seemingly homogeneous populations of cells. Two main different sources contribute to this measured variability: actual differences between the biological activity of the cells and technical measurement errors. Analysis of the biological variability may provide information about the und… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second method, GCL, randomly splits genes into two sets and quantifies their mutual dependence via a distance correlation metric between cell samples evaluated on the two gene sets. This metric was shown to capture both linear and nonlinear gene correlations and is robust to noise in single-cell data ( Vaknin et al 2021 ). Highly correlated gene expression patterns among cells give a high GCL, whereas a low GCL value indicates low levels of similarity in gene expression profiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method, GCL, randomly splits genes into two sets and quantifies their mutual dependence via a distance correlation metric between cell samples evaluated on the two gene sets. This metric was shown to capture both linear and nonlinear gene correlations and is robust to noise in single-cell data ( Vaknin et al 2021 ). Highly correlated gene expression patterns among cells give a high GCL, whereas a low GCL value indicates low levels of similarity in gene expression profiles.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second method, GCL, randomly splits genes into two sets and quantifies their mutual dependence via a distance correlation metric between cell samples evaluated on the two gene sets. This metric was shown to capture both linear and non-linear gene correlations and is robust to noise in single-cell data (Vaknin et al 2021). Highly correlated gene expression patterns among cells give a high GCL, while a low GCL value indicates low levels of similarity in gene expression profiles.…”
Section: Transcriptome Variation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By avoiding the network reconstruction, the GCL also has the advantage that it does not assume pair-wise interactions or a specific form of relation (e.g., linear relations), and it does not assume the same type of interaction for all the pairs of interacting genes. The GCL was also found useful in distinguishing between cell-to-cell variability induced by biological process and variability induced by technical noise in simulations of cellular networks 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%