2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.aim.2017.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A topological transformation group without non-trivial equivariant compactifications

Abstract: Abstract. There is a countable metrizable group acting continuously on the space of rationals in such a way that the only equivariant compactification of the space is a singleton. This is obtained by a recursive application of a construction due to Megrelishvili, which is a metric fan equipped with a certain group of homeomorphisms. The question of existence of a topological transformation group with the property in the title was asked by Yu.M. Smirnov in the 1980s.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pestov raised several questions in [38] about a possible coincidence between the maximal G-compactification and the Gromov compacfification for some natural geometrically defined isometric actions (Urysohn sphere and Gurarij sphere, among others). These problems were studied recently in [16] (with a positive answer in the case of the Urysohn sphere and a negative answer for the Gurarij sphere).…”
Section: One Of the Most General (And Widely Open) Attractive Problem...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Pestov raised several questions in [38] about a possible coincidence between the maximal G-compactification and the Gromov compacfification for some natural geometrically defined isometric actions (Urysohn sphere and Gurarij sphere, among others). These problems were studied recently in [16] (with a positive answer in the case of the Urysohn sphere and a negative answer for the Gurarij sphere).…”
Section: One Of the Most General (And Widely Open) Attractive Problem...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Question 6.3. (H. Furstenberg and T. Scarr (see [31,38])) Let G×X → X be a continuous action with one orbit (that is, algebraically transitive) of a (metrizable) topological group G on a (metrizable) space X. Is it true that X is G-Tychonoff ?…”
Section: Sketchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, this fails in general, as first shown by the second author [24] (resolving a question of de Vries [41]), who built a Polish fan X together with a Polish group G ≤ Homeo(X) such that the system G X has no injective G-compactifications. Recently, and answering an old question of Smirnov, Pestov [31] exhibited an extreme counterexample by constructing a countable metrizable group G and a countable metrizable non-trivial G-space X for which every equivariant compactification is trivial, i.e., a singleton. The example is obtained by a clever iteration of the construction of [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%